From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <simon@superduper.net>
Received: from masada.superduper.net (masada.superduper.net [85.133.44.198])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CEF3200842
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:36:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from c-67-185-169-171.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ([67.185.169.171]
	helo=[192.168.1.113]) by masada.superduper.net with esmtpsa
	(TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <simon@superduper.net>) id 1RSj23-000586-N8
	for bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:36:38 +0000
Message-ID: <4ECB34DB.30609@superduper.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:36:27 -0800
From: Simon Barber <simon@superduper.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
	rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
References: <CAA93jw7_m7Vf8uVLP1oSGbiZ=uLZpC8jPsM7wkacMRArwN7G2A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111121150857.GA7153@tuxdriver.com>
In-Reply-To: <20111121150857.GA7153@tuxdriver.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--)
Subject: Re: [Bloat] some (very good) preliminary results from fiddling with
 byte queue limits on 100Mbit ethernet
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:36:43 -0000

I'm running something called debloat-testing from the Ubuntu kernel PPA 
on my laptop.

Simon

On 11/21/2011 07:08 AM, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 09:33:49PM +0100, Dave Taht wrote:
>
>> So I extracted the current set of BQL related patches from the
>> debloat-testing kernel and applied them to a recent linus-head
>> (3.2-rc2 + a little)
>> (they are at: http://www.teklibre.com/~d/tnq )
>
> FWIW, debloat-testing literally is 3.2-rc2 + the BQL patches.  I hope
> you didn't spend too much time recreating that!
>
> I'm coming to the conclusion that maintaining debloat-testing is
> largely a waste of time.  Does anyone (besides maybe jg) actually
> run it?
>
> John