From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from masada.superduper.net (masada.superduper.net [85.133.44.198]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CEF3200842 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:36:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from c-67-185-169-171.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ([67.185.169.171] helo=[192.168.1.113]) by masada.superduper.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RSj23-000586-N8 for bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:36:38 +0000 Message-ID: <4ECB34DB.30609@superduper.net> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:36:27 -0800 From: Simon Barber User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <20111121150857.GA7153@tuxdriver.com> In-Reply-To: <20111121150857.GA7153@tuxdriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) Subject: Re: [Bloat] some (very good) preliminary results from fiddling with byte queue limits on 100Mbit ethernet X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:36:43 -0000 I'm running something called debloat-testing from the Ubuntu kernel PPA on my laptop. Simon On 11/21/2011 07:08 AM, John W. Linville wrote: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 09:33:49PM +0100, Dave Taht wrote: > >> So I extracted the current set of BQL related patches from the >> debloat-testing kernel and applied them to a recent linus-head >> (3.2-rc2 + a little) >> (they are at: http://www.teklibre.com/~d/tnq ) > > FWIW, debloat-testing literally is 3.2-rc2 + the BQL patches. I hope > you didn't spend too much time recreating that! > > I'm coming to the conclusion that maintaining debloat-testing is > largely a waste of time. Does anyone (besides maybe jg) actually > run it? > > John