From: David Collier-Brown <davec-b@rogers.com>
To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Bloat] Re: calculating baseline latency properly?
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:16:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F0B673A.4050505@rogers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.3.1326139201.14037.bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Dave Taht wrote:
> In measuring ping RTT rather than arrival time elsewhere (which I plan
> to do with RTP at some point), there's actually two variables in play
> send and return time...
>
> So should a RTT latency under load calculation remove the baseline latency
> thusly:
>
> latency_improvement =
> (ping_RTT - baseline_ping_rtt) / (new_ping_RTT - baseline_ping_rtt)
>
> factor 344 improvement
>
> OR keep it:
>
> latency_improvement =
> (ping_RTT) / (new_ping_RTT)
>
> factor 180 improvement...
>
> or would there be another way to compensate for it that made sense?
>
If the improvement in the *baseline* ping times is part of the
improvement you're seeing, it's
fair to include it in the calculation. In other words, if it's causal,
it's golden. If you're unsure, leave it out.
--dave (random capacity-planning guy) c-b
--
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify
System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
davecb@spamcop.net | -- Mark Twain
(416) 223-8968
next parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-09 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.3.1326139201.14037.bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2012-01-09 22:16 ` David Collier-Brown [this message]
2012-01-09 22:27 ` [Bloat] Re: What is fairness, anyway? David Collier-Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F0B673A.4050505@rogers.com \
--to=davec-b@rogers.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=davecb@spamcop.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox