From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rick.jones2@hp.com>
Received: from g1t0027.austin.hp.com (g1t0027.austin.hp.com [15.216.28.34])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.hp.com",
	Issuer "VeriSign Class 3 Secure Server CA - G3" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93D3A201116
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from g1t0039.austin.hp.com (g1t0039.austin.hp.com [16.236.32.45])
	by g1t0027.austin.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D0D38075;
	Sat, 14 Apr 2012 00:37:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [16.89.64.213] (tardy.cup.hp.com [16.89.64.213])
	by g1t0039.austin.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D3DC3481F;
	Sat, 14 Apr 2012 00:37:06 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4F88C6B1.6050907@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:37:05 -0700
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120313 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.20
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
References: <20120406213725.GA12641@uio.no>
	<CAA93jw4ZrRo70uqAG2AOBcXxKmv0T8WFV34rAQSOnVZAk9-6Fw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120406222138.GB12641@uio.no>
	<1333811327.30705.4.camel@edumazet-laptop>
	<CAA93jw57DXSVOtz_Z6b85iSu0a9q67LGhgpHX+YPPxo2oGQWHg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120407153548.GC21452@uio.no>
	<D6DCDC0C-0754-4CE8-8C54-C2A809DB51A7@gmail.com>
	<20120407181034.GD21452@uio.no>
	<CAA93jw5hPBmonhuoww9MqB0z0-uncatP5jGMrrCAepH5ouUwrQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120407185456.GE21452@uio.no> <20120407190134.GF21452@uio.no>
	<CAA93jw6BL=zR-o5Kk0bS8NSc5F0wQmbGe0soY7_xAfUaGMXEDw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6BL=zR-o5Kk0bS8NSc5F0wQmbGe0soY7_xAfUaGMXEDw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Best practices for paced TCP on Linux?
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 00:37:07 -0000

And bufferbloat in the intermediate devices would be one thing, but the 
Linux stack's penchant to grow the socket buffers/windows well beyond 
the bandwidth delay product certainly does not help.

rick jones