From: "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com>
To: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>,
Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
"aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] speedtest-like results for 3g and 4g at ofcom
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 15:03:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4b8f6c897f354d56870ccf99ccfc0fd8@hioexcmbx05-prd.hq.netapp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D119E078.F9FA3%jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com>
Provided they share the whole set of data collected to the individual participants on their dashboard, they don't seem to be collecting anything other than UDP latency (without background load up or down)....
Richard
> -----Original Message-----
> From: aqm [mailto:aqm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Livingood, Jason
> Sent: Montag, 02. März 2015 15:41
> To: Dave Taht; bloat; aqm@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [aqm] [Bloat] speedtest-like results for 3g and 4g at ofcom
>
> This is run by SamKnows. They also run the FCC¹s tests and I asked them
> some time ago to develop a latency under load test but I am not sure it is
> deployed on test units. I will send contact info.
>
>
>
> On 2/28/15, 5:32 PM, "Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Anybody know anybody here that could ask them to run a valid latency
> >under load test?
> >
> >http://media.ofcom.org.uk/news/2014/3g-4g-bb-speeds/
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Dave Täht
> >Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again!
> >
> >https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb
> >_______________________________________________
> >Bloat mailing list
> >Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> >https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
> _______________________________________________
> aqm mailing list
> aqm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-02 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-28 22:32 Dave Taht
2015-03-02 14:41 ` Livingood, Jason
2015-03-02 15:03 ` Scheffenegger, Richard [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4b8f6c897f354d56870ccf99ccfc0fd8@hioexcmbx05-prd.hq.netapp.com \
--to=rs@netapp.com \
--cc=Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com \
--cc=aqm@ietf.org \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox