From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40D653B29D; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 20:12:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A43AD389B4; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 20:09:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id v5J6mzryH7_H; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 20:09:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5938C389B2; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 20:09:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11434618; Sat, 4 Jul 2020 20:12:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Richardson To: cerowrt-devel , bloat In-Reply-To: References: <75705.1593898290@turing-police> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1 X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Cerowrt-devel] apparently this is an end goal of a lot of ipv6 work in the ietf X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2020 00:12:02 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Joel Wir=C4=81mu Pauling wrote: > I read this as basically Huawei and China led Consumers of Huawei kit. Yes. I would not say that it's "IETF". The IETF, as a group, doesn't believe in very much, sometimes not even runn= ing code :-( > I guess potentially if they can solve v6 fragmentation problems then I > would be for it, Segment routing, also should have been a thing for a= long > time. I think that there are some good outcomes to simplifying all forwarding silicon to doing IPv6, and making everything else be an overlay/adaptation. =2D- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh network= s [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect = [ ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails = [ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEbsyLEzg/qUTA43uogItw+93Q3WUFAl8BGs8ACgkQgItw+93Q 3WVg0Qf/dfEuktrfiBsBzFpqN/s6RkZAvSVdsOG0zbky/ub1OzipwLuUxxFJxWcm U3w714Ne/eDV8szvIF/a49QjNbFqgz3AM4p9h/vugC/XXwJTujprxVT/a5Usj5lJ E4/QHYUPZTB1VoSbW8uqg5IJLw5upPj3+66tpgSUZ4RgYwdK0fxtZOHyTr8Q9pUP FPe35KCCLMEGVXwFGoym7H8vgtgiefRMzeGes54vLNzygZibvDLGJ39GGYbGqQAY HA6pFd0w4j/myvzDq47xgKPB3GONsskw+mIcBYqJfztG033aCfT9YBz6b6W+JEtV BRGWule5cUF1WkkgxIl+9owIJAffOQ== =XAHx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--