From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-x229.google.com (mail-qt0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BC203B260 for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2016 08:40:35 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qt0-x229.google.com with SMTP id p16so291530043qta.0 for ; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 05:40:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date:to :mime-version; bh=SeGMeqJMIC+TZs2QhFvvVJaxiq9lfS0aZTwsCSRVd/w=; b=oByaZ+kuHsSl0JNF+sK94moms2hvp7v+MzCM5+T/UcM2pFI05h115GZFwGnwEPpghu 2Mm/1/TW0aSZX3JM6NY8pxICdvXXRG8SMu3W6wzaal583rzEBlnqdccfIn4uZ98R7LrX 90Z6djaik1ePXvPSU/OEK1atnl9cdh53qd5JoCxTom/yfnRXcis1jBPLpR+66b972mkP 5n+5wU+Ad43T2Q1/aR9aW3SU/ZybwRw56Zi8wu2xQVR/ZkwWa+Q9BBoQKONFekTD1BDD tEZVK9dH+B56Pdsf4cQuINCRe+Mt+1kzTiWvi97VVEEPVERQPs7zUcQ4NIdtYFaa3Raq C18Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:subject :message-id:date:to:mime-version; bh=SeGMeqJMIC+TZs2QhFvvVJaxiq9lfS0aZTwsCSRVd/w=; b=esXejnqb0Y9asW2zS7MvoRo7wmWpmfBU1xt9HA/31xHLvv6wQz2pS+CO5ZBHDlY0Lc RsUxbXieTvFtEChNrKpUdmdQxMl+9n0o5+iROfq9SvNfecHVmyBzeqy0/h1stUP0pPqX c7Q52UkOLw6y5BhJV9aMEZVRbW1uh8xqZz/d2/3isIQLUNImZxtG7jxVxPwNuLsUTEZV PmWKfXJSi5niYc/dJHwnx0sfd7dJfGrGN6zwG0905ZXmiSnlKvmXZ5o7FTZMc5jYVGbu dBbmRVj3E6Ebv36k2DuDKDjdjgyDqyI+xMSKaSxHDbS5rEw74WnCKSmaHSgg5X3SOegd r36g== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02njvOzqIBXZUIf0k2vHl+EHwg6ZrRG38vJdr5RC139lNH2b4PbMbOWYa/h60PdhQ== X-Received: by 10.237.36.208 with SMTP id u16mr46598868qtc.213.1480858835452; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 05:40:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from richs-mbp-7071.lan (pool-64-222-225-69.port.east.myfairpoint.net. [64.222.225.69]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z7sm7178852qkz.7.2016.12.04.05.40.34 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 04 Dec 2016 05:40:35 -0800 (PST) From: Rich Brown Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5052DE08-A6AA-4544-B281-5FEBC9572673@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2016 08:40:33 -0500 To: bloat Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Subject: [Bloat] Reasons to prefer netperf vs iperf? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2016 13:40:36 -0000 As I browse the web, I see several sets of performance measurement using = either netperf or iperf, and never know if either offers an advantage. I know Flent uses netperf by default: what are the reason(s) for = selecting it? Thanks. Rich=