From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rick.jones2@hp.com>
Received: from g1t0026.austin.hp.com (g1t0026.austin.hp.com [15.216.28.33])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.hp.com",
	Issuer "VeriSign Class 3 Secure Server CA - G3" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 876FC21F14B;
	Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:41:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from g1t0039.austin.hp.com (g1t0039.austin.hp.com [16.236.32.45])
	by g1t0026.austin.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7087EC0E7;
	Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:41:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [16.103.148.51] (tardy.usa.hp.com [16.103.148.51])
	by g1t0039.austin.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77774340D9;
	Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:41:45 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <50C77E68.8090507@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:41:44 -0800
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
References: <CAD6NSj6et8TQ=5VVHZsjTW6DumnsMXyOz2za+Nsz3CX3-sCMww@mail.gmail.com>
	<1355245195.27891.108.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
	<CAA93jw5Rojac6KiS_zcCDwTQET_yZvhT9NujZqev4jA0x3iBAw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5Rojac6KiS_zcCDwTQET_yZvhT9NujZqev4jA0x3iBAw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] TCP TFO client behaviour
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:41:55 -0000

If there are bugs/issues in Linux's TFO (and IIRC, Linux is the only 
stack with TFO at present) it would probably be best to have that 
discussion in netdev.  At the very least it will have to "finish" in 
netdev anyway.

As for TFO and tools, theoretically, netperf top-of-trunk now has both 
client and server side support, though I've not been able to get it 
particularly tested as yet.  I am however, quite happy to discuss bugs 
in netperf's use of TFO here rather than netperf-talk :)

happy benchmarking,

rick jones