From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mailrelay001.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay001.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.51]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2680F21F14D for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:19:44 -0800 (PST) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjwIAGDYyFBR9tBI/2dsb2JhbABFg0iCKKZtkjoXc4IeAQEFVgYcARALCw0JFg8JAwIBAgERFh4TAQcBAYd6ARarPIgAChmBDYh8jEuBGoMpA5YJgRyET4pdgnQ Received: from 72.208-246-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO zotac.xperim.be) ([81.246.208.72]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 12 Dec 2012 20:19:43 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.44] (mordor.xperim.be [192.168.1.44]) by zotac.xperim.be (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2ubuntu2) with ESMTP id qBCJHQ1I028235; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:17:26 +0100 Message-ID: <50C8D846.8080500@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:17:26 +0100 From: Jan Ceuleers User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <1355245195.27891.108.camel@edumazet-glaptop> In-Reply-To: <1355245195.27891.108.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Bloat] TCP TFO client behaviour X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:19:45 -0000 On 12/11/2012 05:59 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > I really wonder why this is sent to these lists instead of netdev ? Some of us (well: me) have been banned from netdev. As a matter of fact: not only from netdev, but from the whole of vger.kernel.org. For asking the networking maintainer to tone down his foul language. Networking maintainer who is also vger admin...