From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de (mail.net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de [IPv6:2001:470:96b9:4:130:149:220:252]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A22FB21F150 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 04:05:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:96b9:1:14cb:af2e:2e24:2838] (ibis.net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de [IPv6:2001:470:96b9:1:14cb:af2e:2e24:2838]) by mail.net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C5FA14C0CC5 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 13:05:34 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50D1AD8A.1020907@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 13:05:30 +0100 From: Oliver Hohlfeld User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <54532012A5393D4E8F57704A4D55237E3CE5C5E7@CH1PRD0510MB381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <50C89427.8080505@net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Bloat] Bufferbloat at LUG talk - Meeting Report X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 12:05:38 -0000 > Every TCP transfer (which may be collection of web page accesses) that reaches an instantaneous packet rate in-excess of the capacity of the most constrained network element on the path causes such problems. Which problems? I'm missing the relation to my original post. Oliver