From: grenville armitage <garmitage@swin.edu.au>
To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Bufferbloat Paper
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:23:11 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F8A3FF.3090003@swin.edu.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12916ad96425700de4a1892ad43f90b1@lang.hm>
On 01/09/2013 16:02, David Lang wrote:
.[.]
> I really like the idea of trying to measure latency by sniffing the network and watching the time for responses.
Probably tangential, but http://caia.swin.edu.au/tools/spp/ has proven useful to our group for measuring RTT between two arbitrary packet capture points, for symmetric or asymmetric UDP or TCP traffic flows.
Even more tangential, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LCN.2005.101 ("Passive TCP Stream Estimation of RTT and Jitter Parameters") might be an interesting algorithm to implement for estimating RTT of TCP flows seen at a single capture point. (This 2005 paper describes an extension of a technique used by tstat at the time.)
cheers,
gja
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-18 1:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <87r4lvgss4.fsf@toke.dk>
2013-01-09 3:39 ` Mark Allman
2013-01-09 5:02 ` David Lang
2013-01-18 1:23 ` grenville armitage [this message]
2013-01-17 14:03 ` [Bloat] Passive RTT measurements [was: Re: Bufferbloat Paper] Simon Leinen
2013-01-17 14:08 ` Simon Leinen
2013-01-18 23:16 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2013-01-08 19:03 [Bloat] bufferbloat paper Hal Murray
2013-01-08 20:28 ` Jonathan Morton
2013-01-09 0:12 ` David Lang
2013-01-09 1:59 ` Mark Allman
2013-01-09 4:53 ` David Lang
2013-01-09 5:13 ` Jonathan Morton
2013-01-09 5:32 ` Mark Allman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-01-08 7:35 Ingemar Johansson S
2013-01-18 22:00 ` Haiqing Jiang
2013-01-07 23:37 [Bloat] Bufferbloat Paper Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2013-01-08 0:33 ` Dave Taht
2013-01-08 0:40 ` David Lang
2013-01-08 2:04 ` Mark Watson
2013-01-08 2:24 ` David Lang
2013-01-09 20:08 ` Michael Richardson
2013-01-08 4:52 ` Mark Watson
2013-01-08 1:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-01-08 2:15 ` Oliver Hohlfeld
2013-01-08 12:44 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2013-01-08 13:55 ` Mark Allman
2013-01-09 0:03 ` David Lang
2013-01-10 13:01 ` Mark Allman
2013-01-09 20:14 ` Michael Richardson
2013-01-09 20:19 ` Mark Allman
2013-01-09 20:31 ` Michael Richardson
2013-01-10 18:05 ` Mark Allman
2013-01-08 14:04 ` Mark Allman
2013-01-08 17:22 ` Dave Taht
2013-01-09 20:05 ` Michael Richardson
2013-01-09 20:14 ` Mark Allman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50F8A3FF.3090003@swin.edu.au \
--to=garmitage@swin.edu.au \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox