From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <roland.bless@kit.edu>
Received: from iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de (iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de
	[141.3.10.81])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7649721F20C
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 01:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from irams1.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de ([141.3.10.5])
	by iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtps port 25 
	id 1VbnZ2-0008I6-DE; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:25:18 +0100
Received: from i72vorta.tm.uni-karlsruhe.de ([141.3.71.26]
	helo=vorta.tm.kit.edu)
	by irams1.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp port 25 
	id 1VbnZF-0005UF-En; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:25:25 +0100
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by vorta.tm.kit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57035A804E0;
	Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:25:25 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <527213F5.6060406@kit.edu>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:25:25 +0100
From: "Bless, Roland (TM)" <roland.bless@kit.edu>
Organization: Institute of Telematics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Greg White <g.white@CableLabs.com>, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	"aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
References: <CE96C482.20DEB%g.white@cablelabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <CE96C482.20DEB%g.white@cablelabs.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ATIS-AV: ClamAV (irams1.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de)
X-ATIS-AV: ClamAV (iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de)
X-ATIS-Timestamp: iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de 1383207918.
Subject: Re: [Bloat] [aqm] DOCSIS 3.1 support for AQM
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:25:37 -0000

Hi Greg,

Am 30.10.2013 21:13, schrieb Greg White:
> Cable modems are required to implement a variant of PIE (detailed in
> Annex M of MAC and Upper Layer Protocols Interface Specification
> <http://www.cablelabs.com/specifications/CM-SP-MULPIv3.1-101-131029.pdf>) as
> the default AQM.  Modem vendors are free to implement additional
> algorithms if they so choose.  CMTSs are required to implement an AQM
> meeting certain high-level criteria, but the choice of algorithm is left
> to the implementer.

Thanks for the information. I'd be interested in why you have chosen
PIE, e.g., instead of sfq-CoDel. Any pointers to evaluation
reports/results? Last time I saw a presentation on this it seemed
that CoDel was performing quite well.

Regards,
 Roland