From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nbd.name (unknown [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:30e2::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C1A621F1BB for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 05:41:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52A86B6A.8040600@openwrt.org> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:40:58 +0100 From: Felix Fietkau User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Juliusz Chroboczek , bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <595a643098da2500da744c00a8cccd60@imap.pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> In-Reply-To: <595a643098da2500da744c00a8cccd60@imap.pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Bloat] ARAMIS: impressive wifi rate and channel width control algorithm for MIMO networks X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:41:03 -0000 On 2013-12-10 09:33, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: >> http://cs.ucsb.edu/~laradeek/Secon13.pdf > > Do you understand why ARAMIS with training performs so much better than > Minstrel in the > 20 MHz interferer case? One reason could be that the tests were made using the ancient 2.6.32 kernel. I've added many improvements and fixes to minstrel_ht since that release. - Felix