From: Isaac Konikoff <konikofi@candelatech.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Cc: cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Two d-link products tested for bloat...
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 20:22:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54EE9F84.6060508@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4MmZ8bcZBLn93omVppCfq7+Y7hqqsyWeMGCE4V5sGxCw@mail.gmail.com>
On 02/25/2015 04:23 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Here's a comparison plot of box totals:
>> http://www.candelatech.com/downloads/rtt_fair4be-comparison-box-plot.png
>>
>> That's a real mess. All of them utterly fail to get download bandwidth
>> anywhere near the upload (am I right in assuming it should ideally be about
>> equal?), and the only ones with even halfway acceptable latency are the ones
>> with least throughput in either direction.
>
> And I suspect that this was a test at the highest possible MCS rates
> and txpower. Isaac?
Yes, highest MCS for each AP and fw defaulted tx power. I can experiment
with attenuation and lower MCS rates as well.
>
>>
>> - Jonathan Morton
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-26 4:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-20 2:04 Dave Taht
2015-02-20 5:32 ` Aaron Wood
2015-02-20 8:47 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-02-20 9:03 ` Dave Taht
2015-02-20 17:20 ` [Bloat] [Cerowrt-devel] " dpreed
2015-02-26 0:00 ` [Bloat] " Isaac Konikoff
2015-02-26 0:18 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-02-26 0:23 ` Dave Taht
2015-02-26 4:22 ` Isaac Konikoff [this message]
2015-02-26 4:37 ` Dave Taht
2015-02-27 5:00 ` Isaac Konikoff
2015-02-27 5:12 ` Dave Taht
2015-02-27 19:15 ` Isaac Konikoff
2015-02-26 16:56 ` Stephen John Smoogen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54EE9F84.6060508@candelatech.com \
--to=konikofi@candelatech.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox