From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from p-mail1.rd.orange.com (p-mail1.rd.orange.com [195.101.245.15]) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A6B201253 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 06:06:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from p-mail1.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 26B0CFC4008; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:06:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.194.32.11]) by p-mail1.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B910FC4004; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:06:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from [172.31.0.14] (10.193.116.12) by FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (10.194.32.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:06:35 +0100 Message-ID: <54EF2877.8030302@orange.com> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:06:47 +0100 From: MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mikael Abrahamsson References: <201502250806.t1P86o5N011632@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk> <4A80D1F9-F4A1-4D14-AC75-958C5A2E8168@gmx.de> <3F47B274-B0E4-44F2-A434-E3C9F7D5D041@ifi.uio.no> <87twyaffv3.fsf@toke.dk> <1D438EDC-358D-4DD5-9B8D-89182256F66C@gmx.de> <54EDD951.50904@orange.com> <54EE07C0.60703@orange.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Bloat] RED against bufferbloat X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:07:05 -0000 On 02/26/2015 01:54 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN wrote: > >> MIPS based board with a central unit and several programmable asics >> as accelerators. Fast path is not managed by the central unit. > > And you made the programmable asics to FQ? I'd love to be able to > pitch this to vendors as an example what should be done. > Done with the vendor itself with related NDA etc. It takes longer to set the agreement than coding the system. The problem is that this process is not ok. An ISP cannot maintain someone else product if it is closed.