From: David Collier-Brown <davec-b@rogers.com>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>, davecb@spamcop.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Bulk] Re: Motivating commercial entities? tell the sales manager
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 07:46:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F8503F.9090600@rogers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJq5cE0Z9pTwU0vnk5L3m1yWdmB7yxNw2oPKiLLnSOsi115f3w@mail.gmail.com>
There is an advantage for members of the Alliance to step out ahead of
the pack, especially if they build components used in both portables and
base stations, and then a lesser advantage that they still interoperate
with less advanced systems.
A group like the Alliance would be more interested in having the
technology implemented the same way for everyone, so as not to fragment
the business and reduce everyone's profits.
If either of those motivations provides a way in, then so much the
better. If the Alliance does a technical conference, a presentation on
how wired performance was improved might be interesting to their members.
--dave
On 03/03/2015 04:20 PM, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>
> It strikes me that the Wi-Fi Alliance might be able to help with the
> marketing side of deployment once we solve the Wi-Fi specific
> problems. They have a certification process which, at least in theory,
> could help ensure that implementations actually work as advertised in
> practice.
>
> The trick of course is that membership with them is expensive and you
> need to show a genuine business interest, rather than a technical one.
> Maybe there's a back route for bringing technical things to their
> attention.
>
> If so, and if we can find it, we might start seeing "Responsive
> Wi-Fi™" on boxes next year.
>
> - Jonathan Morton
>
--
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify
System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
davecb@spamcop.net | -- Mark Twain
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-05 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.154220.1425403251.1815.bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2015-03-03 19:46 ` [Bloat] Motivating commercial entities? tell the sales manager (was: ping loss "considered harmful") David Collier-Brown
2015-03-03 20:19 ` Dave Taht
2015-03-03 21:08 ` Dave Taht
2015-03-03 21:20 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-05 12:46 ` David Collier-Brown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54F8503F.9090600@rogers.com \
--to=davec-b@rogers.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=davecb@spamcop.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox