From: MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN <luca.muscariello@orange.com>
To: "David P. Reed" <dpreed@reed.com>,
"Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>,
Greg White <g.white@CableLabs.com>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Cerowrt-devel] DOCSIS 3+ recommendation?
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 15:14:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <550C2B58.8020403@orange.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dd77bbfc-1bf6-433e-80d2-bf9b203a0051@reed.com>
FYI, we have this in France.
http://www.arcep.fr/index.php?id=8571&tx_gsactualite_pi1[uid]=1701&tx_gsactualite_pi1[annee]=&tx_gsactualite_pi1[theme]=&tx_gsactualite_pi1[motscle]=&tx_gsactualite_pi1[backID]=26&cHash=f558832b5af1b8e505a77860f9d555f5&L=1
ARCEP is the equivalent of FCC in France.
User QoS is measured in the fixed access by third parties.
The tests they run can be ameliorated of course but the concept is right.
The data is then published periodically.
Luca
On 03/20/2015 03:08 PM, David P. Reed wrote:
> M-Lab is better by far. But control by Google automatically discredits
> it's data. As well as the claims by operators that measurements by
> independent parties violate their trade secrets. Winning that battle
> requires a group that can measure while supporting a very expensive
> defense against lawsuits by operators making such claim of trade secrecy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-20 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20150316203532.05BD21E2@taggart.lackof.org>
[not found] ` <123130.1426635142@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
[not found] ` <b8526a9c-5305-4467-8fd2-a6d1e0016903@reed.com>
[not found] ` <CAJq5cE2nLRKuq64vQgpPSQ01e2Mc5Vtguo6smQg+ySC8mLH=aQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <15A0911A-E3B7-440A-A26B-C5E1489EA98B@viagenie.ca>
[not found] ` <CAJq5cE1UFgt6fpLxRH7m3VFUpziGZm9OLCCNFQ93QemH00CHaQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1426773234.362612992@apps.rackspace.com>
2015-03-19 17:11 ` Dave Taht
2015-03-19 19:58 ` Livingood, Jason
2015-03-19 20:29 ` dpreed
2015-03-19 23:18 ` Greg White
2015-03-20 8:18 ` MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN
2015-03-20 13:31 ` David P. Reed
2015-03-20 13:46 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-20 14:05 ` MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN
2015-03-20 10:07 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-20 13:50 ` [Bloat] Latency Measurements in Speed Test suites (was: DOCSIS 3+ recommendation?) Rich Brown
2015-03-29 17:36 ` Pedro Tumusok
2015-03-30 7:06 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-30 13:56 ` Pedro Tumusok
2015-03-30 14:18 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-30 14:20 ` Pedro Tumusok
2015-03-30 14:55 ` Dave Taht
2015-03-30 16:05 ` Pedro Tumusok
2015-03-31 5:07 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2015-04-01 17:21 ` Pedro Tumusok
[not found] ` <CAH3Ss96599p_22c+9Dm5s2LUGwkvnc_ivunpz6aTzDAteS1ZPg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CACQiMXYxbbLh=rVWK2MnTfo7xePoy794k_V36XDrJxybKiiC9g@mail.gmail.com>
2015-04-07 17:16 ` [Bloat] Fwd: " Pedro Tumusok
2015-03-30 16:20 ` [Bloat] " Livingood, Jason
2015-03-31 1:30 ` Pedro Tumusok
2015-03-31 4:14 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-30 14:42 ` [Bloat] Latency Measurements in Speed Test suites Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2015-03-20 13:57 ` [Bloat] [Cerowrt-devel] DOCSIS 3+ recommendation? Livingood, Jason
2015-03-20 14:08 ` David P. Reed
2015-03-20 14:14 ` MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN [this message]
2015-03-20 14:48 ` Matt Mathis
2015-03-20 13:48 ` Jim Gettys
2015-03-20 14:11 ` Livingood, Jason
2015-03-20 14:54 ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-20 15:31 ` Jim Gettys
2015-03-20 15:39 ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-20 16:31 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-20 20:59 ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-20 23:47 ` David P. Reed
2015-03-21 0:08 ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-21 0:03 ` David Lang
2015-03-21 0:13 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2015-03-21 0:25 ` David Lang
2015-03-21 0:34 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-21 0:38 ` David Lang
2015-03-21 0:43 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-03-22 4:15 ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-21 0:15 ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-21 0:29 ` David Lang
2015-03-22 4:10 ` Michael Welzl
2015-03-20 18:14 ` Jonathan Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=550C2B58.8020403@orange.com \
--to=luca.muscariello@orange.com \
--cc=Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dpreed@reed.com \
--cc=g.white@CableLabs.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox