Re: [Bloat] delay-under-load really helps diagnose real world problems

[Simon Barber <simon@superduper.net>]

I ran some tests from my cellphone - a Samsung Note 3. I had to select 
'request desktop site' as an option in the chrome browser, and not 
choose '4G' as my connection type (I chose DSL), to get the latency 
measurement to show up. The results are great though.

http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/355893

Download bloat (buffer in the cell site) is bad, but not absolutely 
horrible, at about 1.1 seconds. Upload direction is terrible - 5.8 
seconds by the end of the test, and would probably have been higher 
given a longer test. I'm assuming that this buffer is in the modem in 
the handset, and is likely an almost infinite buffer.

Simon

On 4/24/2015 7:58 AM, Matthew Ford wrote:
>> On 23 Apr 2015, at 22:55, Bill Ver Steeg (versteb) <versteb@cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>> So, hats off to Justin!
> A big +1 to what Bill said from me. This tool is great and has already helped me improve my own home network setup.
>
> A colleague noted that selecting ‘Public WiFi’ as connection type results in no bloat measurements. Which connection types are bloat measurements enabled for? What’s the plan for the others?
>
> Mat
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat