From: Adrian Kennard <a@k.gg>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Bloat goes away, but with ~25% speed loss?
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 18:27:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5571DC01.70301@k.gg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4DR6j414NqKbRirQXvDLG1K45YWyUpm9oanYH3zhoq3w@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/06/2015 18:23, Dave Taht wrote:
>>> A&A struck me as an extremely clueful ISP (I think they have had ipv6
>>> /48s for forever?)
>>> and it has been my impression that folk like that were using things
>>> like HFSC + SFQ already
>>> in their "rate limiters", and had experimented also with fq_codel by now.
Oh, I meant to say, the policers used on broadband links have a very
very simple logic of small packets (<1000) are allowed more predicted
lag, and so VoIP "just works" as does DNS, interactive key presses, TCP
ACK packets and all sorts of time critical stuff.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-05 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-03 21:18 Rich Brown
2015-06-04 20:01 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-06-05 14:33 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-06-05 16:19 ` Dave Taht
2015-06-05 17:20 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-06-05 17:23 ` Dave Taht
2015-06-05 17:25 ` Adrian Kennard
2015-06-05 17:27 ` Adrian Kennard [this message]
2015-06-05 17:44 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-06-05 17:48 ` Dave Taht
2015-06-05 17:51 ` Adrian Kennard
2015-06-05 17:57 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-06-05 17:59 ` Adrian Kennard
2015-06-05 19:44 ` Dave Taht
2015-06-05 20:06 ` Dave Taht
2015-06-05 22:45 ` jb
2015-06-05 22:52 ` Dave Taht
[not found] ` <55722786.7090904@hp.com>
2015-06-06 0:32 ` jb
2015-06-06 0:40 ` Rick Jones
2015-06-06 3:54 ` Aaron Wood
2015-06-06 4:13 ` jb
2015-06-06 8:45 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-06-06 9:30 ` jb
2015-06-06 10:04 ` Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
2015-06-06 10:22 ` jb
2015-06-04 23:32 ` Aaron Wood
2015-06-04 23:38 ` Rick Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5571DC01.70301@k.gg \
--to=a@k.gg \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=kevin@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox