From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <a@k.gg>
Received: from b.painless.aa.net.uk (b.painless.aa.net.uk
	[IPv6:2001:8b0:0:30:5054:ff:fe5e:1643])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AE0521F635
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Fri,  5 Jun 2015 10:51:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sightless.bracknell.aa.net.uk
	([2001:67c:2a40:0:aaaa:aaaa:aaaa:aaaa])
	by b.painless.aa.net.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.77)
	(envelope-from <a@k.gg>)
	id 1Z0vmJ-0007cJ-W7; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 18:51:35 +0100
Message-ID: <5571E1A7.9050403@k.gg>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 18:51:35 +0100
From: Adrian Kennard <a@k.gg>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10;
	rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
References: <7D4DDC3F-9233-4E07-B59B-AA1368CA9D4E@gmail.com>	<CAJq5cE0DYBt9nGAFk6EHezakDrvwS=1hLGg31HLxx0WQ+EvRww@mail.gmail.com>	<5571B334.7050607@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>	<CAA93jw6CqNnRarHru=6YxSAgj01V34OHh8gjxLBhdsRYUKCJ=Q@mail.gmail.com>	<5571DA4E.5060809@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>	<CAA93jw4DR6j414NqKbRirQXvDLG1K45YWyUpm9oanYH3zhoq3w@mail.gmail.com>	<5571DC01.70301@k.gg>
	<CAA93jw5dRkFUcTuhO1FN5vtDXcrEMO+cASwk8DV28a+Dzc=4mg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5dRkFUcTuhO1FN5vtDXcrEMO+cASwk8DV28a+Dzc=4mg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Bloat goes away, but with ~25% speed loss?
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 17:52:07 -0000

On 05/06/2015 18:48, Dave Taht wrote:
> So I am curious as to how well A&A's AS20712 (?) clients are doing on
> the new dslreports.com/speedtest, which shows the "bloat" grade and
> actual behavior over time?

As I say, we try not to be a factor in buffering, so would be
interesting to see. I suspect it is the equipment at bottlenecks (DSL
modems) that are the biggest concern apart from endpoints. Our logic
tries to stop any downlink kit being a buffering point by use of a
policer though, and that seems to work.