From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from masada.superduper.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:ba8:1f1:f263::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C5EB21F649 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 11:03:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 199-116-72-167.public.monkeybrains.net ([199.116.72.167] helo=[192.168.0.19]) by masada.superduper.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0vxL-0003cZ-FC; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 19:03:01 +0100 Message-ID: <5571E450.7090209@superduper.net> Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 11:02:56 -0700 From: Simon Barber User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Hironori Okano -X (hokano - AAP3 INC at Cisco)" , "bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net" , "aqm@ietf.org" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010800080102030400090509" X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) Cc: "Rong Pan \(ropan\)" , "Preethi Natarajan \(prenatar\)" Subject: Re: [Bloat] FQ-PIE kernel module implementation X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 18:03:33 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010800080102030400090509 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Very cool. Does this mean that Cisco are not planning on enforcing any IP rights over PIE? Simon On 6/4/2015 3:06 PM, Hironori Okano -X (hokano - AAP3 INC at Cisco) wrote: > Hi all, > > I’m Hironori Okano and Fred’s intern. > I’d like to let you know that I have implemented FQ-PIE as a linux > kernel module “fq-pie" and iproute2 for fq-pie. > This was done in collaboration with others at Cisco including Fred > Baker, Rong Pan, Bill Ver Steeg, and Preethi Natarajan. > > The source codes are in my github repository. I attached patch file > “fq-pie_patch.tar.gz” to this email also. > I’m using the latest linux kernel > (git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git) > > fq-pie kernel module > https://github.com/hironoriokano/fq-pie.git > > iproute2 for fq-pie > https://github.com/hironoriokano/iproute2_fq-pie.git > > If you have any comments, please reach out to me. > > Best regards, > > Hironori Okano > hokano@cisco.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat --------------010800080102030400090509 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Very cool. Does this mean that Cisco are not planning on enforcing any IP rights over PIE?

Simon

On 6/4/2015 3:06 PM, Hironori Okano -X (hokano - AAP3 INC at Cisco) wrote:
Hi all,

I’m Hironori Okano and Fred’s intern. 
I’d like to let you know that I have implemented FQ-PIE as a linux kernel module “fq-pie" and iproute2 for fq-pie.
This was done in collaboration with others at Cisco including Fred Baker, Rong Pan, Bill Ver Steeg, and Preethi Natarajan.

The source codes are in my github repository. I attached patch file “fq-pie_patch.tar.gz” to this email also.
I’m using the latest linux kernel (git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git)

fq-pie kernel module

iproute2 for fq-pie

If you have any comments, please reach out to me.

Best regards,

Hironori Okano


_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat

--------------010800080102030400090509--