* Re: [Bloat] [Cerowrt-devel] google wifi
[not found] ` <CAA93jw53hNtueSjc_WZpy_vPXWOwk3hiw4-W3tfFdX+kJTuhyQ@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2015-09-22 22:08 ` Isaac Konikoff
2015-10-01 18:48 ` Isaac Konikoff
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Isaac Konikoff @ 2015-09-22 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cerowrt-devel, bloat
Started testing an onhub box with lanforge and flent...just wifi to lan
side for now compared to a netgear r8000.
Configuration of the onhub is somewhat limited because you have to use
the google-on app and many settings are not available such as picking a
channel, setting ht/mcs rates, disabling encryption, etc... Also, it
appears that the wan port requires a live internet connection for any
functionality at all.
Here are some reports and data on what I've tested so far:
candelatech.com/downloads/wifi-reports/trial2
Here are some sample plots from the data:
candelatech.com/downloads/wifi-reports/trial2/rtt_fair4be-box-plot-comparison.png
candelatech.com/downloads/wifi-reports/trial2/tcp-download-box-plot-comparison.png
candelatech.com/downloads/wifi-reports/trial2/10stations-ht80-to-onhub-udp-only.png
candelatech.com/downloads/wifi-reports/trial2/63stations-ht80-to-onhub-udp+tcp.png
I'm planning to do some more comparisons with other ap's or maybe some
additional flent tests to netperf.bufferbloat.net. I'll publish those
results when available.
Isaac
On 08/18/2015 01:56 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> I would like very much for someone from this group to put this box
> through it's paces with flent on the isp side, and to test the wifi
> side with the rtt_fair tests, and publish their results.
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bloat] [Cerowrt-devel] google wifi
2015-09-22 22:08 ` [Bloat] [Cerowrt-devel] google wifi Isaac Konikoff
@ 2015-10-01 18:48 ` Isaac Konikoff
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Isaac Konikoff @ 2015-10-01 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cerowrt-devel, bloat
Found an interesting way to bind firefox to an interface, so I can run
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest from eth1, sta1, sta2, etc...to test
the wifi to internet path of different APs even though it eventually all
goes through our main router at the cable modem.
http://www.ryde.net/code/bind.c.txt
Anyway, here are some results:
eth0 on my desktop: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/1516977
eth1 through Onhub: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/1517395
sta1 through Onhub: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/1517298
sta2 through Onhub: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/1517364
eth1 through R8000: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/1517769
sta1 through R8000: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/1517821
sta2 through R8000: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/1517871
On 09/22/2015 03:08 PM, Isaac Konikoff wrote:
> Started testing an onhub box with lanforge and flent...just wifi to lan
> side for now compared to a netgear r8000.
>
> Configuration of the onhub is somewhat limited because you have to use
> the google-on app and many settings are not available such as picking a
> channel, setting ht/mcs rates, disabling encryption, etc... Also, it
> appears that the wan port requires a live internet connection for any
> functionality at all.
>
> Here are some reports and data on what I've tested so far:
> candelatech.com/downloads/wifi-reports/trial2
>
> Here are some sample plots from the data:
> candelatech.com/downloads/wifi-reports/trial2/rtt_fair4be-box-plot-comparison.png
>
>
> candelatech.com/downloads/wifi-reports/trial2/tcp-download-box-plot-comparison.png
>
>
> candelatech.com/downloads/wifi-reports/trial2/10stations-ht80-to-onhub-udp-only.png
>
>
> candelatech.com/downloads/wifi-reports/trial2/63stations-ht80-to-onhub-udp+tcp.png
>
>
> I'm planning to do some more comparisons with other ap's or maybe some
> additional flent tests to netperf.bufferbloat.net. I'll publish those
> results when available.
>
> Isaac
>
> On 08/18/2015 01:56 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>> I would like very much for someone from this group to put this box
>> through it's paces with flent on the isp side, and to test the wifi
>> side with the rtt_fair tests, and publish their results.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-10-01 18:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20150818200840.31F771EF@taggart.lackof.org>
[not found] ` <20150818203315.DF3861EF@taggart.lackof.org>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.02.1508181342230.27696@nftneq.ynat.uz>
[not found] ` <CAA93jw53hNtueSjc_WZpy_vPXWOwk3hiw4-W3tfFdX+kJTuhyQ@mail.gmail.com>
2015-09-22 22:08 ` [Bloat] [Cerowrt-devel] google wifi Isaac Konikoff
2015-10-01 18:48 ` Isaac Konikoff
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox