From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from g4t3426.houston.hp.com (g4t3426.houston.hp.com [15.201.208.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1106C3CB80 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 15:09:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from g4t3433.houston.hp.com (g4t3433.houston.hp.com [16.210.25.219]) by g4t3426.houston.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CCFB6B for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 20:09:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [16.103.148.51] (tardy.usa.hp.com [16.103.148.51]) by g4t3433.houston.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494266E for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 20:09:26 +0000 (UTC) To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net References: From: Rick Jones Message-ID: <56B25E76.3080506@hpe.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 15:29:56 -0400 Subject: Re: [Bloat] Difference between codel and fq_codel? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 20:09:29 -0000 X-Original-Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 12:09:26 -0800 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 20:09:29 -0000 On 02/03/2016 11:22 AM, John Klimek wrote: > I'm currently using pfaense which only supports codel and not > fq_codel. Is there a big difference between them? Is it worth > looking into using a different router? My simplistic understanding is fq_codel creates several/many different queues, spreading flows across those queues and applying codel on each queue. http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/tc-fq_codel.8.html http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/tc-codel.8.html rick jones