From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gpo2.cc.swin.edu.au (gpo2.cc.swin.edu.au [136.186.1.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 290B03B260 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 20:43:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [136.186.229.37] (garmitage.caia.swin.edu.au [136.186.229.37]) by gpo2.cc.swin.edu.au (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id u740h9dk010342 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Aug 2016 10:43:09 +1000 To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net, aqm@ietf.org References: <84e6b7ab-b7e6-10c0-084a-bd5cb5d4b03f@taht.net> <595be984-efaa-8cbf-3376-1f29150e200d@pollere.com> From: grenville armitage Message-ID: <57A28F9D.8060506@swin.edu.au> Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 10:43:09 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <595be984-efaa-8cbf-3376-1f29150e200d@pollere.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Bloat] [aqm] pie, codel, fq_pie, fq_codel tech report X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 00:43:17 -0000 Kathy, Dave, Thanks for the +ve comments! On 08/04/2016 03:03, Kathleen Nichols wrote: > Nicely laid out and reported, but I have a question for the authors. At= the > top of section II. D. it says: > "Instantaneous=E2=80=99 throughput is an approximation derived > from the actual bytes transferred during constant windows > of time." > > Is the "actual bytes transferred" the sum of the packet sizes through > the link or is it the actual advance in sequence number bytes? Simplistic sum of the IP payload lengths per unit time as seen at the des= tination's NIC. (We took the line of least resistance for this tech repo= rt. But yes, the advance of sequence num. per unit time would be a more p= recise estimate of the useful flow of bytes as experienced by the applica= tion.) cheers, gja > > thanks, > Kathie > > > On 8/3/16 6:37 AM, Dave T=C3=A4ht wrote: >> I am especially grateful for the full documentation of how to configur= e >> the bsd versions of this stuff, but the rest of the report was pretty >> good too. >> >> http://caia.swin.edu.au/reports/160708A/CAIA-TR-160708A.pdf >> _______________________________________________ >> Bloat mailing list >> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat >> > _______________________________________________ > aqm mailing list > aqm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm --=20 Professor Grenville Armitage Director, Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures School of Software and Electrical Engineering Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology Swinburne University of Technology, Australia http://caia.swin.edu.au