From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: John D <j.w.r.dexter@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Dual WAN home router with decent SQM?
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 07:35:16 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58238rpr-80q1-3p5s-849q-604ns5659s7r@ynat.uz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKWkaxH5B57XoVhQqh7DHmPB7mxmzyN8zwPWVLerhcqxedMzjA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1145 bytes --]
any router that you can run OpenWRT on will do the job
look at the mwan3 package to mange the multiple ISPs
at 100Mb, you don't need an especially beefy router.
David Lang
On Sun, 4 Jun 2023, John D
via Bloat wrote:
> Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 09:48:21 +0100
> From: John D via Bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> Reply-To: John D <j.w.r.dexter@gmail.com>
> To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> Subject: [Bloat] Dual WAN home router with decent SQM?
>
> I want to set up a new home router with SQM support to alleviate (mostly
> upload) bloat.
> However I would also like dual ISP support, more for backup/failover than
> load sharing.
> I can see affordable multi wan "load balancer" routers eg TP-link, and
> affordable SQM routers such as ubiquity Edgerouter, but I'm struggling to
> find a single device providing both.
> Just after any advice on a) am I better having two separate components b)
> if so any suggestions which product/brand?
> Two devices means more configuration but possibly more flexible and cheaper.
>
> My internet speed is looking to max out around 100/20mbps so I don't need
> Gbit performance. Thanks for any help.
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 140 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-04 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-04 8:48 John D
2023-06-04 13:07 ` Nils Andreas Svee
2023-06-04 13:57 ` John D
2023-06-04 14:22 ` Nils Andreas Svee
2023-06-04 14:35 ` David Lang [this message]
2023-06-05 16:06 ` Luis A. Cornejo
2023-06-05 16:20 ` David Lang
2023-06-05 16:24 ` Dave Taht
2023-06-05 18:25 ` John D
2023-06-05 18:53 ` David Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58238rpr-80q1-3p5s-849q-604ns5659s7r@ynat.uz \
--to=david@lang.hm \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=j.w.r.dexter@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox