From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lang.hm (unknown [66.167.227.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3C393B2A4 for ; Sun, 4 Jun 2023 10:35:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dlang-mobile (unknown [10.2.2.69]) by mail.lang.hm (Postfix) with ESMTP id D988E193FC6; Sun, 4 Jun 2023 07:35:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 07:35:16 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lang To: John D cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <58238rpr-80q1-3p5s-849q-604ns5659s7r@ynat.uz> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="===============3931209686415377317==" Subject: Re: [Bloat] Dual WAN home router with decent SQM? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2023 14:35:18 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --===============3931209686415377317== Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII any router that you can run OpenWRT on will do the job look at the mwan3 package to mange the multiple ISPs at 100Mb, you don't need an especially beefy router. David Lang On Sun, 4 Jun 2023, John D via Bloat wrote: > Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 09:48:21 +0100 > From: John D via Bloat > Reply-To: John D > To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > Subject: [Bloat] Dual WAN home router with decent SQM? > > I want to set up a new home router with SQM support to alleviate (mostly > upload) bloat. > However I would also like dual ISP support, more for backup/failover than > load sharing. > I can see affordable multi wan "load balancer" routers eg TP-link, and > affordable SQM routers such as ubiquity Edgerouter, but I'm struggling to > find a single device providing both. > Just after any advice on a) am I better having two separate components b) > if so any suggestions which product/brand? > Two devices means more configuration but possibly more flexible and cheaper. > > My internet speed is looking to max out around 100/20mbps so I don't need > Gbit performance. Thanks for any help. > --===============3931209686415377317== Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Disposition: INLINE X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KQmxvYXQgbWFp bGluZyBsaXN0CkJsb2F0QGxpc3RzLmJ1ZmZlcmJsb2F0Lm5ldApodHRwczovL2xpc3RzLmJ1ZmZl cmJsb2F0Lm5ldC9saXN0aW5mby9ibG9hdAo= --===============3931209686415377317==--