From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-x235.google.com (mail-qk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C8A421F2E0 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 17:49:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qkx62 with SMTP id 62so44136258qkx.0 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 17:48:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=bYUU8yHCl/uKs+0nLDcjU9d7KWgh7VYm15t4JHiyISw=; b=Awl5YJN+lFkcvFk6gTADj7A3xZZNiW7nXT+UWyWrLKSRwuZiJSWdVJXGQIAZlPkaGk lURGQYERjwNw5BBu1wql0YUwTpElcfZk8yMkpMGWh/2nHTLhnJtLJ2h5tNKJOmVgUFec RVtDhQqAcyYK1S2wim2vfIkAAjh2hIHQJKyEAc+Y4p/RHiDkNRHUhmqdsySwodYQ5T/2 5RLHuY4OWmk1bgQPSU8VpGMaYKFgMfplsqPg35yPJVxyCPQRJXF9tYasaky4wp4W9R4s +mwynO0adeh84eMBma6KwNaGT/M0Q/44mKgN0MLLog1tpnJmNGTXsQw1uy1yZiwuLb6h rikw== X-Received: by 10.140.49.11 with SMTP id p11mr7570895qga.60.1430441336537; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 17:48:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from richs-mbp-11940.home.lan (pool-71-169-155-204.burl.east.myfairpoint.net. [71.169.155.204]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 197sm17341236qhq.23.2015.04.30.17.48.55 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Apr 2015 17:48:55 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Rich Brown In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 20:48:54 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <58258E43-953F-4A3B-ABC0-EA4193CC67C1@gmail.com> References: <87618e6gkm.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> To: Dave Taht X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Cc: bloat Subject: Re: [Bloat] extremely good dslreports result for bufferbloat on free.fr X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 00:49:47 -0000 > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:33 PM, jb wrote: > ... >> if it did get a rating it would be an "D" or "F".. >=20 > How about "E" for error? That can be further explained in the text > "Sometimes the bloat is so bad that we cannot adaquately test for it - > and other times there is something else badly wrong with the link that > we cannot identify." I would stay away from a letter grade for that state, since it could = appear to be on the continuum of A+, A, B, C, D, E (?) F... Better to give it a "-" or "?" mark. And if they hover over the "?", let = the text show: "Sometimes the bloat is so bad that we cannot adaquately = test for it - and other times there is something else badly wrong with = the link that we cannot identify." Rich=