General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Richard Scheffenegger" <rscheff@gmx.at>
To: "Kevin Gross" <kevin.gross@avanw.com>, <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Jumbo frames and LAN buffers
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 20:40:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5BEAA2E0AC0742ECA603E3EFEAFBD1DB@srichardlxp2> (raw)


Also found this:
http://www.stanford.edu/~balaji/papers/QCN.pdf

Jim, you may notice that the congestion feedback probability function looks 
just like the basic RED marking function :)

Regards,
  Richard

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Scheffenegger" <rscheff@gmx.at>
To: "Kevin Gross" <kevin.gross@avanw.com>; <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 8:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Jumbo frames and LAN buffers


> Kevin,
>
>> My understanding is that 802.1au, "lossless Ethernet", was designed
>> primarily to allow Fibre Channel to be carried over 10 GbE so that SAN 
>> and
>> LAN can share a common infrastructure in datacenters. I don't believe 
>> anyone
>> intends for it to be enabled for traffic classes carrying TCP.
>
> Well, QCN requires a L2 MAC sender, network and receiver cooperation (thus 
> you need fancy "CNA" converged network adapters, to start using it - these 
> would be reaction/reflection points; plus the congestion points - 
> switches - would need HW support too; nothing one can buy today; 
> higher-grade (carrier?) switches may have the reaction/reflection points 
> built into them, and could use legacy 802.3x signalling outside the 
> 802.1Qau cloud).
>
> The following may be too simplistic
>
> Once the hardware has a reaction point support, it classifies traffic, and 
> calculates the per flow congestion of the path (with flow really being the 
> classification rules by the sender), the intermediates / receiver sample 
> the flow and return the congestion back to the sender - and within the 
> sender, a token bucket-like rate limiter will adjust the sending rate of 
> the appropriate flow(s) to adjust to the observed network conditions.
>
> http://www.stanford.edu/~balaji/presentations/au-prabhakar-qcn-description.pdf
> http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2007/au-pan-qcn-details-053007.pdf
>
> The congestion control loop has a lot of similarities to TCP CC as you 
> will note...
>
> Also, I haven't found out how fine-grained the classification is supposed 
> to be (per L2 address pair? Group of flows? Which hashing then to use for 
> mapping L2 flows into those groups between reaction/congestion/reflection 
> points...).
>
>
> Anyway, for the here and now, this is pretty much esoteric stuff not 
> relevant in this context :)
>
> Best regards,
>  Richard
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Kevin Gross" <kevin.gross@avanw.com>
> To: <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 3:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [Bloat] Jumbo frames and LAN buffers
>
>
>> All the stand-alone switches I've looked at recently either do not 
>> support
>> 802.3x or support it in the (desireable) manner described in the last
>> paragraph of the linked blog post. I don't believe Ethernet flow control 
>> is
>> a factor in current LANs. I'd be interested to know the specifics if 
>> anyone
>> sees it differently.
>>
>> My understanding is that 802.1au, "lossless Ethernet", was designed
>> primarily to allow Fibre Channel to be carried over 10 GbE so that SAN 
>> and
>> LAN can share a common infrastructure in datacenters. I don't believe 
>> anyone
>> intends for it to be enabled for traffic classes carrying TCP.
>>
>> Kevin Gross
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: bloat-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> [mailto:bloat-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net] On Behalf Of Jim Gettys
>> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2011 5:24 AM
>> To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> Subject: Re: [Bloat] Jumbo frames and LAN buffers
>>
>> Not necessarily out of knowledge or desire (since it isn't usually
>> controllable in the small switches you buy for home).  It can cause
>> trouble even in small environments as your house.
>>
>> http://virtualthreads.blogspot.com/2006/02/beware-ethernet-flow-control.html
>>
>> I know I'm at least three consumer switches deep, and it's not by choice.
>>                     - Jim
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bloat mailing list
>> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>>
> 


             reply	other threads:[~2011-05-16 18:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-16 18:40 Richard Scheffenegger [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-26 17:05 [Bloat] Network computing article on bloat Dave Taht
2011-04-26 18:13 ` Dave Hart
2011-04-26 18:17   ` Dave Taht
2011-04-26 18:32     ` Wesley Eddy
2011-04-30 19:18       ` [Bloat] Goodput fraction w/ AQM vs bufferbloat Richard Scheffenegger
2011-05-05 16:01         ` Jim Gettys
2011-05-05 16:10           ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-05-05 16:49             ` [Bloat] Burst Loss Neil Davies
2011-05-08 12:42               ` Richard Scheffenegger
2011-05-09 18:06                 ` Rick Jones
2011-05-12 16:31                   ` Fred Baker
2011-05-13  5:00                     ` Kevin Gross
2011-05-13 14:35                       ` Rick Jones
2011-05-13 14:54                         ` Dave Taht
2011-05-13 20:03                           ` [Bloat] Jumbo frames and LAN buffers (was: RE: Burst Loss) Kevin Gross
2011-05-14 20:48                             ` Fred Baker
2011-05-15 18:28                               ` Jonathan Morton
2011-05-15 20:49                                 ` Fred Baker
2011-05-16  0:31                                   ` Jonathan Morton
2011-05-16  7:51                                     ` Richard Scheffenegger
2011-05-16  9:49                                       ` Fred Baker
2011-05-16 11:23                                         ` [Bloat] Jumbo frames and LAN buffers Jim Gettys
2011-05-16 13:15                                           ` Kevin Gross
2011-05-16 13:22                                             ` Jim Gettys
2011-05-16 13:42                                               ` Kevin Gross
2011-05-16 15:23                                                 ` Jim Gettys
     [not found]                                               ` <-854731558634984958@unknownmsgid>
2011-05-16 13:45                                                 ` Dave Taht
2011-05-16 18:36                                             ` Richard Scheffenegger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5BEAA2E0AC0742ECA603E3EFEAFBD1DB@srichardlxp2 \
    --to=rscheff@gmx.at \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=kevin.gross@avanw.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox