[Bloat] FWA Test Results

[Bloat] FWA Test Results

[Livingood, Jason]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 460 bytes --]

This is from a colleague that was using 5G FWA at home. Their computer was connected to the gateway via Ethernet and the gateway was next to a glass door with LoS to the tower ~0.25 mi away (no tree/leaf or other obstructions). So definitely a best case for location in the home & connectivity to the RAN and no competing LAN traffic at the time of the test.

https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=55167384-3ee5-4f5d-a1ea-131458b231f6

Jason

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2320 bytes --]

Re: [Bloat] FWA Test Results

[Luis A. Cornejo]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 881 bytes --]

That unloaded ping off pretty good, it must be from 5G SA. I’m with
T-Mobile no 5G SA yet, I’m in the 60s for unloaded.

On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 1:51 PM Livingood, Jason via Bloat <
bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:

> This is from a colleague that was using 5G FWA at home. Their computer was
> connected to the gateway via Ethernet and the gateway was next to a glass
> door with LoS to the tower ~0.25 mi away (no tree/leaf or other
> obstructions). So definitely a best case for location in the home &
> connectivity to the RAN and no competing LAN traffic at the time of the
> test.
>
>
>
>
> https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=55167384-3ee5-4f5d-a1ea-131458b231f6
>
>
>
> Jason
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2015 bytes --]