From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nm18-vm8.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm18-vm8.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.115.87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 912053B2A3 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 09:24:29 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rogers.com; s=s2048; t=1485267869; bh=S/XbZlVTWqEnWtYe4k964weqKMKEpXOJPE+vA9plUlw=; h=Reply-To:Subject:References:To:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=LBJyRcMD2WFkRzqFbfJaNFhX1WvqTomVZkCdqokPy+gpoNfn3D/ONAqT8YiiNNpXjI+c6icTZTnb/9Xww74OoLQwq8rWicjSRoRJmCZJ3Iejb3pZDgw5ifSLFGxjaMtyfHfnDZqAKATENxn/tRIbDUFAtJhGMF+dvWJ3e9VfLeAckNDBwh/VbOhShJQjdjRfQ7h6h48DVozKFfxMWxBX+o9pOPnxFHhsc7hR0vT522jGuypUijS1KEBIIoGqjngs+UCtzX6U+4ke7azY46sj0HRq4+/F1arrnQFYAD9vzrRy6keG64ciuyqK7cpaUMnUL5PccbljGe0lGKCg+ta0EA== Received: from [66.196.81.158] by nm18.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Jan 2017 14:24:29 -0000 Received: from [98.139.244.49] by tm4.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Jan 2017 14:24:29 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp111.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Jan 2017 14:24:29 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 209469.41988.bm@smtp111.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 0x5eTpMVM1mUu8vIZkif.dibKIMxSX0014pVeND6CwW4uYO JpmSEGKobGcXXC_86pAvYRnNRKSPKeZhemBF53pbo4g8kpIDohjZ37wrUhfk n46A52Sr0w_wStVi68SUjKk8M3bXS0ogspXb8vxmFiwK9kML.9XurYVEEvzi 18uFSy6F9swm9gCf1k2PC1tzPmLc6qZXaoUbKqgqF3SOd6ecO1jbnqP2HSCa gu1GcjgyuLlWb40WtBx107I61TIJh880e1BvJQFo6zxfjagZ2.sFPnzhdt4W HA0x6rSPS.S8g_dY79S7QoCZY1GgBhBUdn7ir9cJsYv9b5fbYQYc.km4P4T. dKU8HHEX.lhJRcMDO5_.6MJQBWPnGTbZxfA.hqD.zAVbnZtyNjX_mY.3L6Ah sQmQLQ94MelR_HrLjg4OYYABfWdur8TJ4WLLVQzCALkTWn_bCrt9T9xkGZyX lYBE1FE6aBib7CwTts.diiSrAbr0LgsuYaNRlKWZfnBcifME_C5S_M.gcgKp nMSQz9joVvZ5RismOJaNAqIEOQ.OLJHLrvjww_Ugnq_hNnM.uRwV3UMLIgOO nmlYfsdeGHcjsXIDQZK2nGw-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: sltvjZWswBCRD.ElTuB1l9j6s9wRYPpuyTNWOE5oEg-- Reply-To: davecb@spamcop.net References: <1485265115.227821858@mobile.rackspace.com> To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net From: David Collier-Brown Message-ID: <5e407ab9-bbcb-6859-b4dc-e91d9fb2cc68@rogers.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 09:24:27 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1485265115.227821858@mobile.rackspace.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Bloat] Making association faster X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 14:24:29 -0000 On 24/01/17 08:38 AM, dpreed@reed.com wrote: > https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.02528 > > Interesting approach. Nice analysis. > > Needs to be in OpenWRT? > > > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat It's more of a client mechanism as such: the access point needs to do a sort of mirror image, to keep scan times down and be seen as a preferred connection target. Not being bottlenecked looks important (;-)) --dave -- David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest davecb@spamcop.net | -- Mark Twain