From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qg0-x22e.google.com (mail-qg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E3023B2A0 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 12:54:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qg0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 52so61630879qgy.0 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2016 09:54:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=xINmefFUqxeWMQoXk4T/lwe9lGoFyjXInyp2w2TYN1E=; b=wom0pAM+DmalXaiWtsZVJbZsFdEHgFRmGy3saHRr1Z+x3VpT1ey8XIu9g2RT8ab0W5 5C62c5FuW8RPJycAIcoadZAeCNzWSa38Oyf3POq5/4nLVSUkpzJvDS8WL/g2jQk6BuzH E/kBkkgdpsKYECDZuuJHPQK/y8sf+qDrOnqP7vnmu5iipF+StcLkypaVVdsnRS+xQKOe ODihmlMxywmGcQHmjn3M1hUritIF3ATZqSSKOiz3JMATUDRwPJwyW3ed8an26UqzotsS si3ei6opjxgKEfobl6sGcvx4AdHz9h/EnNcYopaHUEJ4JVqzKuYevSBFZwFJjUv4CrqT pHUQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=xINmefFUqxeWMQoXk4T/lwe9lGoFyjXInyp2w2TYN1E=; b=AznbUOEQcykOkZZCLqhklBhx3WHrPBzRFIUY7eTZi0LASDugSda+mJ3fg8jAEw0NJ3 1BH7vHvrOf3dTui7fI1H/Jyd76ABeVT8CsKVcUUsCG+vw+NcI2gm/JV0rh53IPPCnri7 pzmfejtwjZvSLJNR2oEkMel0BlFC5/tQ0r3QsgD3tkLFXj+Fg0+Rp63CbNoezMIUm+oQ MdqFWYXSKGdHda+4vkmQR9lyUAxKCxCgo3hA0TayswmK3ebeWZ+Ui2IlctSD1XlrAZZc QfBpNhmh2Hmfxm2fqPkw2l6ipGBtYlQMb4q9c/otQsFO+pHHkApt/fQijU/ZDzU1hnLj LDuA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJ5Yf6PBvOc9NVOjbDCMeHk/iIbIHCC1QMRKjlUGjZTotrz/iPBmZNcRznX9TNPAw== X-Received: by 10.140.22.36 with SMTP id 33mr25984430qgm.0.1464886491862; Thu, 02 Jun 2016 09:54:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.253.145] ([68.238.49.248]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n137sm6564250qke.0.2016.06.02.09.54.50 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Jun 2016 09:54:50 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) From: Rich Brown In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 12:54:49 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <611C5E3C-C51A-44F8-9D7A-A64BA717FABB@gmail.com> References: To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Subject: Re: [Bloat] new public web tests for bufferbloat X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 16:54:52 -0000 I just tested the Sourceforge.net tester. Comments: - It's pretty, although only works if you have the screen maximized. = Epic fail if you try it on a smart phone. - My Adblock Plus also threw it for a loop. I had to switch to my = secondary browser (unblocked) to test it - Download measurement and bufferbloat numbers are believable - Upload rate was not (768kbps DSL only measured at 100kbps) - Result page is confusing TL;DR - they seem to have all the elements in place to measure the = latency during transfers. If they fix some of these problems, they'll = have a winner. I sent very shortfeedback (both good and bad) by clicking Like and = Dislike buttons. I left an email address to see if they would like to = receive a longer critique. We'll see what happens. Rich