From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from homiemail-a28.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 468E73B260 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:47:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from homiemail-a28.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a28.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64D141B4078; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 08:47:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kmnimac.local (unknown [50.136.231.153]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nichols@pollere.net) by homiemail-a28.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA4731B4058; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 08:47:01 -0700 (PDT) To: bloat From: Kathleen Nichols Message-ID: <68b1c3f2-dfc3-ffc3-da8b-24c535d77df0@pollere.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 08:47:00 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Bloat] some experiments with downstream queue delay X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 15:47:03 -0000 Pollere has been working on passive monitoring methods, in particular on monitoring delay. This has something of a slog, but whenever there is data, it's pretty fun. I've been running our prototype in my home network and wrote up the delay results in a note: http://pollere.net/Pdfdocs/FunWithTSDE.pdf in case anyone would like a look. Please let me know of any misconceptions in the note. Kathie