From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-x233.google.com (mail-qk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C21E3B2A2 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 23:08:25 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id n204so249160167qke.2 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:08:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id:cc:to :mime-version; bh=AC401ahuQacdwrWz9oZToeuslJ2uKh2jgWleFEpWMlE=; b=gGjs/5eOicp2CRvVvQT9oa7RqdltLtWd2nDpoHYIcf62dJnov1REblD4hP1n7pLBn5 EnvJpHS3hRc4Y1ToQcdMxwJooOqt9qfuc3cOiqezicJjIYXbbcNz+Qu3CXT4uoW8h7qu /uk7E8l3rcpaVFzFfpdQpL7C+ziKo1D/bQjZauOqMSL3YrL1SATTbrrrgM7R3nABHaeG gVozmox34Be7L5hV8taWNH9CbS8xMmPzRsQxz3XKUPSe2pV2rGF++QMBpdusi/Z9FSss J1Acji2EnQniFkxFC0mUKRAV290RAGpeBg2p9OYII/mDGsVJ+n3o+0bBhznqJ3P/HTC7 NWyA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date :message-id:cc:to:mime-version; bh=AC401ahuQacdwrWz9oZToeuslJ2uKh2jgWleFEpWMlE=; b=VQwzXv/OehVtlk7V5OL2ee7TSDZBp309xJTv+xK4FB5lTuuN1b8zSDb1y8+u8j5z7F XfUZG5I3ITc0XUfW30LioBrWBV3QLgWkUhnyQF/4oVILA7SojGxd1km2aPB1WkNFBvDH 3Ip1H0v5QTBHwDDXFiaXoQx28FOqk+482MYP5aGpjY5c5BJQtbuYthinYZfV3Lk9Jt+y 8Q3NiGOxBDCw6mSx35v/OJDqcXluVc+zvrSoNSaVmdoOcQu/JKZDLVis1+w8536BoyjF kfuzVFUtvTaBOAcVWvMJ0bo+KW84yKTX2TwCQesaOThnNOBnd/K7oW8fwyIHOQHTPZ0h Q6ig== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00ni5uNdC83r4Cy9ubURzGYPWzq3qzc7jw3cw+gDGZPMH7uDu7i1lJWeX90cvB9qA== X-Received: by 10.55.89.197 with SMTP id n188mr9084123qkb.217.1479442105589; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:08:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from richs-mbp-6385.lan (d-ptld-bng1-64-222-154-203.ngn.east.myfairpoint.net. [64.222.154.203]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h47sm3145826qtc.27.2016.11.17.20.08.24 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:08:25 -0800 (PST) From: Rich Brown Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 23:08:23 -0500 Message-Id: <6C19376A-CDCD-44B3-9A14-A70C136980C5@gmail.com> Cc: bloat To: jb Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Subject: [Bloat] Differences between dslr cli program vs. web test X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 04:08:26 -0000 I find a marked difference between the measurements that come from the = dslr cli program and the web tester. The CLI seems to show slower speeds than the web tester. Here's data = from one web run, and two CLI runs. I'm running on a mid-2015 MacBook Pro, 2.5 GHz i7, 16 GBytes of RAM, OSX = 10.10.5, with 7mbps/768kbps DSL. What other information would you want = to see? Thanks! Rich ----------- Web GUI: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6241603 (shows 6.91/0.57 = Mbps) bash-3.2$ ./dslrcli-darwin-amd64 --version Dslrcli version 0.1 - 15-Nov-2016 bash-3.2$ ./dslrcli-darwin-amd64 --uploadtime 30 --downloadtime 30 Selecting nearest servers.... Download Testing..... Upload Testing..... Uploading results... Download : 6.62 Megabit/sec Upload : 901.93 Kilobit/sec http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6241561 bash-3.2$ ./dslrcli-darwin-amd64 Selecting nearest servers.... Download Testing..... Upload Testing..... Uploading results... Download : 6.58 Megabit/sec Upload : 778.23 Kilobit/sec http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/6241492=