From: rjmcmahon <rjmcmahon@rjmcmahon.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>, Rpm <rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Rpm] receive window bug fix
Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2023 11:56:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <709fd354372c370233f4b4eb33bab216@rjmcmahon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7fUq4+4=UQjpuTr5tEs5h70LxD8nK5frUwDEr59cxGFg@mail.gmail.com>
> these folk do good work, and I loved the graphs
>
> https://blog.cloudflare.com/unbounded-memory-usage-by-tcp-for-receive-buffers-and-how-we-fixed-it/
Very cool. Thanks for sharing.
I've been considering adding stress tests to iperf 2. Looks like
Cloudfare has at least two
Small reads & writes with short delay to stress receive window
processing per
At the sending host, run a TCP program with an infinite loop, sending
1500B packets, with a 1 ms delay between each send.
At the receiving host, run a TCP program with an infinite loop,
reading 1B at a time, with a 1 ms delay between each read.
And then, rx buffer limit tests, from
https://blog.cloudflare.com/optimizing-tcp-for-high-throughput-and-low-latency/
reads as fast as it can, for five seconds this is called fast mode,
opens up the window
calculates 5% of the high watermark of the bytes reader during any
previous one second
for each second of the next 15 seconds: this is called slow mode
reads that 5% number of bytes, then stops reading
sleeps for the remainder of that particular second
most of the second consists of no reading at all
steps 1-3 are repeated in a loop three times, so the entire run is 60
seconds
This has the effect of highlighting any issues in the handling of
packets when the buffers repeatedly hit the limit.
Curious about any other traffic scenarios driven by socket read/write
behaviors that could be useful. Or any others that might apply to WiFi
aggregation.
Then, if there is a way to generalize these types of send/read/delay
graphs with a parametric command line?
Bob
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-03 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-03 8:03 [Bloat] " Dave Taht
2023-06-03 18:20 ` [Bloat] [Rpm] " Aaron Wood
2023-06-03 19:15 ` rjmcmahon
2023-06-03 18:56 ` rjmcmahon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=709fd354372c370233f4b4eb33bab216@rjmcmahon.com \
--to=rjmcmahon@rjmcmahon.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=rpm@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox