From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lb0-x235.google.com (mail-lb0-x235.google.com
	[IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::235])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D29421F5D1
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 03:47:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lbbqq2 with SMTP id qq2so111273497lbb.3
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 03:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
	:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
	bh=gMkUt6X4Cg57/xMBLpZGfXXyhbmqSjE1TlgOiieVPuw=;
	b=0D2dORPpXCogut6PzedXvNeQNsB5P0xdxOdkKUDv6z8s0FsL7rZ5jPVoV3PH2TgThB
	YM6le1D/1YB4leIdFc1DdKZyzXega9k0ACqFKeDZT5isppVp7KFRt3Ey/SdFPE2o5sUU
	+uTi2G64kqGiBdMIgsnpwmjQ0IqEtwaGxMf37HwY619GRU6pjALdhStmGq7jTCA4hRIm
	bK+4fwVxbwPy2a3/PzCXvDnkPxAC8Hsn3Qjc2BTTj+F6LFGwI7IV5f4tWdpSrYvKh5Ll
	auX4ww1I2CKaff3N90tTUP5TFmhcgaxeTagqmBhwldFV08uKKb6tZuX93MqndSyyuzEZ
	h01g==
X-Received: by 10.112.160.227 with SMTP id xn3mr11267671lbb.112.1429440426919; 
	Sun, 19 Apr 2015 03:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bass.home.chromatix.fi (87-95-107-170.bb.dnainternet.fi.
	[87.95.107.170])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o8sm3598750lal.2.2015.04.19.03.47.02
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Sun, 19 Apr 2015 03:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA5684DF-3492-4BED-9AD0-168CEF999DF4@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 13:46:26 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <75C1DDFF-FBD2-4825-A167-92DFCF6A7713@gmail.com>
References: <CAH3Ss97f2AY3nB2Lo07h18pmm8yDn9EYw7=ZjRKZRTg66DUEAw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA5684DF-3492-4BED-9AD0-168CEF999DF4@gmx.de>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] DSLReports Speed Test has latency measurement built-in
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:47:38 -0000


> On 19 Apr, 2015, at 13:20, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:
>=20
> Reporting the latency under load as frequency (inverse of delay time) =
would be nice in that higher numbers denote a "better=94 link, but has =
the issue that it is going to be hard to quickly add different latency =
sources/components...

Personally I=92d say that this disadvantage matters more to us =
scientists and engineers than to end-users.  Frequency readouts are =
probably more accessible to the latter.

 - Jonathan Morton