From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
Received: from mx143.netapp.com (mx143.netapp.com [216.240.21.24])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "mx143.netapp.com",
	Issuer "VeriSign Class 3 International Server CA - G3" (not verified))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4899621F3B4
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sat, 16 May 2015 00:25:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,439,1427785200"; d="scan'208";a="42355458"
Received: from hioexcmbx04-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.37])
	by mx143-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 16 May 2015 00:25:43 -0700
Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.40) by
	hioexcmbx04-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.37) with Microsoft SMTP
	Server (TLS) id 15.0.1076.9; Sat, 16 May 2015 00:25:40 -0700
Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([::1]) by
	hioexcmbx07-prd.hq.netapp.com ([fe80::f07f:691d:89d:53b7%21]) with mapi
	id 15.00.0995.031; Sat, 16 May 2015 00:25:40 -0700
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
Thread-Topic: [Bloat] [Cerowrt-devel] heisenbug: dslreports 16 flow test vs
	cablemodems
Thread-Index: AQHQj20M0y+5fbouEUOpUxUcsx/x8Z1+qYQA
Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 07:25:40 +0000
Message-ID: <78BEA606-43B0-4AC8-9685-3110141239B1@netapp.com>
References: <CAA93jw65hQvEsTWnW6rxdhw33KVt+N7eeqxcg7w-rPvPqW3H6Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<D17AB499.4BF5D%g.white@cablelabs.com>
	<CALQXh-N04E_wJrAyB=qu3kR3cCUj2bmGjWLV+byp3eRFtPZqsw@mail.gmail.com>
	<8C015B1B-EFBA-4647-AD83-BAFDD16A4AF2@netapp.com>
	<DF86DC46-FCB9-40B4-840B-F0CD8F7895DD@gmx.de> <55562F79.20006@hp.com>
In-Reply-To: <55562F79.20006@hp.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.2100)
x-originating-ip: [10.120.60.35]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <F16275A05FFA3B4584E29BE1DE13ADF5@hq.netapp.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net" <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Cerowrt-devel] heisenbug: dslreports 16 flow test vs
 cablemodems
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 07:26:29 -0000
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 07:26:29 -0000
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 07:26:29 -0000
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 07:26:29 -0000
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 07:26:29 -0000

On 2015-5-15, at 19:40, Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com> wrote:
>=20
>>> You really need to embed timestamps in the TCP bytestream and echo them=
 back. See the recent netperf patch I sent.
>>=20
>> 	I hope this makes into the main netperf branch=85
>=20
> I'm still debating.

That patch was a bad hack, but something like this done in a clean way woul=
d be a nice addition. But I'm biased...

Lars=