From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <richb.hanover@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-vn0-x22c.google.com (mail-vn0-x22c.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::22c])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9920C21F1ED
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Wed,  3 Jun 2015 14:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vnbf1 with SMTP id f1so2875013vnb.6
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 14:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date
	:to:mime-version;
	bh=x+jcR6sCRa/fzGl4BrrD/z0Ny5sr9IaLykepP8dNYWg=;
	b=hRsHbwbG5TtQmsxYML73fiKvUzD+hf7Z23NWmuEgZlFenpn08oKV8kRVjMagBEWJuy
	Lcdzn41SSgneH2ZmGYbzmOrowDCCv8QU5CHMKUnU1y4/VoatRiZfYETWqA43PLbTI09t
	0tSn4Hq9HZzN0fd3dWXcRarKE8kNUFKWUt1wVae0NlDKJBe/J4+fVI9gBgkKTSEcqJ/c
	afgt9z0aFHnkSS3+iOLLCKjfBfF7iXXYlaSQQ+TjkdQYUXI74KFT/7pM0rDYpkWjB6GK
	oWZhYc5febMQqOBd9TQ+kJjI9bEgR55waGiKE8VDGVAb55zlIALsHFr0C0PBuO+K6rNZ
	CA4A==
X-Received: by 10.52.228.42 with SMTP id sf10mr50175067vdc.12.1433366309140;
	Wed, 03 Jun 2015 14:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from richs-mbp-12926.lan
	(pool-72-71-239-202.cncdnh.east.myfairpoint.net. [72.71.239.202])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id de3sm2198836vdc.17.2015.06.03.14.18.28
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Wed, 03 Jun 2015 14:18:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7D4DDC3F-9233-4E07-B59B-AA1368CA9D4E@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 17:18:42 -0400
To: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Subject: [Bloat] Bloat goes away, but with ~25% speed loss?
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 21:18:58 -0000

I'm supporting people re: SQM/fq_codel on some of the boards, and came =
across a refractory problem, and I'd like to get some advice.

Summary: A person is using OpenWrt 14.07 (same code base as CeroWrt =
3.10.50-1) and SQM. Turning on SQM decreases, but doesn't eliminate, =
bufferbloat. They also lose a significant fraction of their bandwidth =
(from ~12-13 mbps down to ~9-10mpbs down, with similar decrease on the =
upload side).

Original report: =
http://www.techsupportforum.com/forums/f31/bufferbloat-wont-go-away-997842=
.html=20

- I have confirmed that it's set up right and that there doesn't seem to =
be any other shaping in play.=20

- Also, the ISP has confirmed that the tower involved does get =
overloaded, but I'm not sure how that would affect the SQM rates while =
leaving unchanged the unshaped measurements...

What other thoughts/advice could I offer? Thanks!

Rich=