On 06/12/2018 02:42 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> https://ripe76.ripe.net/presentations/10-2018-05-15-bbr.pdf
> "More research needed". Naturally ;)
>
> (But yeah, good points overall)

Interesting. Potentially, all affectuated. After having applied the BBR
2.0, we might are back to Cubic? :D

Moreover, if it tends to be unstable on larger scale - what is Google
doing then? Thought they've got a more or less homogeneous BBR driven
TCP flow ecosystem - at least internally!? Was all propaganda? When
speculating, might working for them since of centrally handled flow
steering approaches - "imposing inter-flow fairness".

-- 

Besten Gruß

Matthias Tafelmeier