From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jch@pps.jussieu.fr>
Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F178D201A69
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon, 16 May 2011 08:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hydrogene.pps.jussieu.fr (hydrogene.pps.jussieu.fr
	[134.157.168.1])
	by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.14.4/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id p4GF9pu5029642
	; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:10:04 +0200 (CEST)
X-Ids: 168
Received: from lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr (lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr
	[134.157.168.57])
	by hydrogene.pps.jussieu.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ED22C337F;
	Mon, 16 May 2011 17:09:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from jch by lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr with local (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <jch@pps.jussieu.fr>)
	id 1QLzQc-0000w3-5t; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:09:50 +0200
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.jussieu.fr>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
References: <4DA67BBE.9050606@taht.net>
	<1303145028.24248.1442482225@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<1304695674.3066.57.camel@edumazet-laptop>
	<BANLkTin1k_ZfgjKk1sgxamTCRJqBE66exw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 17:09:50 +0200
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTin1k_ZfgjKk1sgxamTCRJqBE66exw@mail.gmail.com> (Dave Taht's
	message of "Fri, 6 May 2011 12:14:23 -0600")
Message-ID: <7i4o4uhebl.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Miltered: at jchkmail.jussieu.fr with ID 4DD13E3F.002 by Joe's j-chkmail
	(http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 4DD13E3F.002/134.157.168.1/hydrogene.pps.jussieu.fr/hydrogene.pps.jussieu.fr/<jch@pps.jussieu.fr>
Cc: Bufferbloat Mainlinglist <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] No ECN marking in IPv6 linux
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 15:00:47 -0000

> I am curious as to what the correct behavior here should be for encapsulated
> (6in4, 6to4, teredo) packets,

RFC 3168 sections 9.1 and 9.2 (which I've read), but I fear it may have
been updated by RFC 6040 (which I haven't).

-- Juliusz