From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.jussieu.fr>
To: Otto Solares Cabrera <solca@guug.org>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] SFB tuning
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 00:05:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7id3izg7y8.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110530005244.GB14958@guug.org> (Otto Solares Cabrera's message of "Sun, 29 May 2011 18:52:44 -0600")
Thanks a lot for the data.
>> (Are you seeing any queuedrop?)
Okay, both queuedrop and penaltydrop are 0 on all interfaces, which
means that you don't overflow any buffers and that the penalty box is
not being used -- tweaking limit and the penalty rate will have no effect.
I don't understand what you're doing on eth6, which has both prio and htb.
You're systematically putting sfq below sfb. You should be aware that
since sfb keeps the queues short, the effect of sfq is reduced somewhat
-- you may not be getting all the fairness you're expecting.
Your packet loss rates are
eth4 (Internet): 0.6%
eth2 (LAN): 0.2%
eth6 (Wifi): 3.6%
Only eth6 is congested. Three quarters of the eth6 drops are in sfb
52:. There's 3.6 times more earlydrop than bucketdrop, which seems okay
to me. Increasing increment/decrement might reduce the bucketdrop
somewhat; so would increasing the target, at the cost of increasing the
amount of queueing.
Thanks again for the data,
-- Juliusz
P.S. Wow ! Guatemala !
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-30 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-21 14:27 [Bloat] Applying RED93 in south africa Dave Taht
2011-05-21 19:11 ` Jonathan Morton
2011-05-21 19:29 ` Dave Taht
2011-05-28 20:02 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2011-05-31 15:02 ` Jim Gettys
2011-05-28 20:07 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2011-05-28 20:16 ` Dave Taht
2011-05-28 20:30 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2011-05-28 20:59 ` [Bloat] SFB tuning (was Re: Applying RED93 in south africa) Otto Solares Cabrera
2011-05-29 15:29 ` [Bloat] SFB tuning Juliusz Chroboczek
2011-05-30 0:52 ` Otto Solares Cabrera
2011-05-30 22:05 ` Juliusz Chroboczek [this message]
2011-05-30 23:37 ` Otto Solares Cabrera
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7id3izg7y8.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr \
--to=jch@pps.jussieu.fr \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=solca@guug.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox