From: Dave Collier-Brown <dave.collier-brown@indexexchange.com>
To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Bloat] Sidebar re illustrating quality (was: New Version Notification for draft-cpaasch-ippm-responsiveness-00.txt)
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 13:50:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <80e0a336-06e4-c6b6-a01b-f849296086a6@indexexchange.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YR59ZKPsCPL1pSpv@MacBook-Pro-2.local>
On 2021-08-19 11:48 a.m., Christoph Paasch via Bloat wrote:
> I agree. Just measuring RPM is not useful. As one can have excellent RPM but
> still have an Internet connection that is barely usable.
>
> However, I still believe that a single score for the user would be great
> (that score would not be RPM though). This score should group together a
> large list of network-properties (RPM, goodput, idle latency, protocol
> conformance,...) and express a value of utility to the user that express how
> its user-experience is affected. It would make it much easier for non-technical
> users to compare the quality of their Internet without just focusing on a
> single throughput-metric.
>
> But that is a different topic than RPM ;-)
>
I can't actually draw a picture of it here, but there's a good way to
show multiple limiting factor graphically. One is with a bucket,
http://www.imthird.org/the-limiting-factor-concept, but for comparisons
I like a simpler one
For an example, imagine a large letter "Y" with the stem labelled
"throughput", one arm labelled "latency" and the other "RPM". There's a
dotted-line circle drawn over it so that the two arms touch the circle,
and the stem sticks out through it.
The diameter of the circle is the "goodness" of the connection, and you
can line up diagrams like this for Bell, Rogers and Telus and see that
they all have fine throughput but lousy latency and RPM. And it extends
to multiple dimensions as well as multiple suppliers, so you could have
a five-legged Y if you wanted. I like three, myself.
I first saw this used for nutrients in the first edition of "Diet for a
Small Planet", but the editors found it too nerdy and talked the author
into taking it out (:-()
--dave
--
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify
System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
dave.collier-brown@indexexchange.com | -- Mark Twain
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER : This telecommunication, including any and all attachments, contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any dissemination, distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly prohibited and is not a waiver of confidentiality. If you have received this telecommunication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return electronic mail and delete the message from your inbox and deleted items folders. This telecommunication does not constitute an express or implied agreement to conduct transactions by electronic means, nor does it constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment or an acceptance of a contract offer. Contract terms contained in this telecommunication are subject to legal review and the completion of formal documentation and are not binding until same is confirmed in writing and has been signed by an authorized signatory.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-19 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-13 21:41 [Bloat] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-cpaasch-ippm-responsiveness-00.txt Christoph Paasch
2021-08-15 13:39 ` Erik Auerswald
2021-08-18 22:01 ` Christoph Paasch
2021-08-19 7:17 ` Erik Auerswald
2021-08-19 15:48 ` Christoph Paasch
2021-08-19 17:50 ` Dave Collier-Brown [this message]
2021-08-19 21:17 ` [Bloat] Sidebar re illustrating quality (was: New Version Notification for draft-cpaasch-ippm-responsiveness-00.txt) Kenneth Porter
2021-08-20 1:58 ` Dave Collier-Brown
2021-08-21 1:22 ` Kenneth Porter
2021-08-21 11:01 ` Sebastian Moeller
2021-08-21 10:23 ` Erik Auerswald
2021-08-21 16:31 ` Dave Collier-Brown
2021-09-21 20:50 ` [Bloat] [ippm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-cpaasch-ippm-responsiveness-00.txt Toerless Eckert
2021-10-22 23:19 ` Christoph Paasch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=80e0a336-06e4-c6b6-a01b-f849296086a6@indexexchange.com \
--to=dave.collier-brown@indexexchange.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox