General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: rick.jones2@hp.com
Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Random idea in reaction to all the discussion of TCP flavours - timestamps?
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:56:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <845EB260-932A-42F4-800C-005196B32D48@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1300400436.2087.2401.camel@tardy>


On 18 Mar, 2011, at 12:20 am, Rick Jones wrote:

>>> So initialRTO is specced currently to be 3 seconds, with a small but
>>> non-trivial effort under way to reduce that, but once established
>>> connections have a minimum RTO of less than or equal to a second don't
>>> they?
>> 
>> If the RTT they measure is low enough, then yes.  If the queues
>> lengthen, the measured RTT goes up and so does the RTO, once the
>> connection is established.
> 
> Right.  I should have been more explicit about "You know it won't
> retransmit any sooner than N." (for some, changing value of N :)

I think there is a minimum value, on the order of 100ms - I don't know precisely.

>> But the *initial* RTO is the important one for unmanaged queue sizing,
>> because that determines whether a new connection can be started
>> without retransmissions, all else functioning correctly of course. 
>> There is no way to auto-tune that.
>> 
>> Note also that with AQM that can re-order packets, the length of the
>> bulk queue starts to matter much less, because the SYN/ACK packets can
>> bypass most of the traffic.  In that case the RTT measured by the
>> existing bulk flows will be higher than the latency seen by new and
>> interactive flows.
> 
> I would think that unless the rest of the segments of the connection
> will also bypass most of the traffic, the SYN or SYN|ACK should not
> bypass - to do so will give the TCP connection a low, unrealistic
> initial estimate of the RTT.

> SYN and SYN|ACK segments should not receive special treatment beyond
> what data segments for the same connection would get.

I was thinking of SFQ, which doesn't discriminate based on TCP flags, only on addresses and ports.

With that said, while a low initial estimate of RTT is bad for calculating RTO, it is not so bad for the rest of the congestion control system.  Remember that a major problem with Vegas is that it can grossly overestimate the optimal RTT if, because the queues are already full, it never sees the real propagation time.

 - Jonathan


  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-17 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-15 10:36 Jim Gettys
2011-03-15 14:40 ` Jim Gettys
2011-03-15 16:47   ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-15 17:59     ` Don Marti
2011-03-15 18:14       ` Rick Jones
2011-03-15 18:31         ` John W. Linville
2011-03-15 19:40           ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-15 19:59             ` Rick Jones
2011-03-15 20:51             ` John W. Linville
2011-03-15 21:31               ` Rick Jones
2011-03-16  0:32                 ` John W. Linville
2011-03-16  1:02                   ` Rick Jones
2011-03-15 22:01               ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-15 22:19                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-03-15 22:26                   ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-15 22:36                     ` Rick Jones
2011-03-15 22:40                       ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-15 22:42                         ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-03-15 22:52                       ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-15 23:02                         ` Rick Jones
2011-03-15 23:12                         ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-15 23:25                           ` Rick Jones
2011-03-15 23:33                             ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-15 23:46                         ` Dave Täht
2011-03-16  0:49                           ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-16  1:02                             ` Dave Täht
2011-03-16  1:28                               ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-16  1:59                                 ` Dave Täht
2011-03-16  2:23                                   ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-16 22:22                                     ` [Bloat] Random idea in reaction to all the discussion of TCPflavours " Richard Scheffenegger
2011-03-16 23:38                                       ` richard
2011-03-16 23:50                                         ` Rick Jones
2011-03-17 12:05                                       ` Fred Baker
2011-03-17 12:18                                         ` Fred Baker
2011-03-17 17:27                                           ` Dave Täht
2011-03-18 18:30                                           ` Richard Scheffenegger
2011-03-18 18:49                                             ` Fred Baker
2011-03-20 11:40                                               ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-20 22:18                                                 ` david
2011-03-20 22:45                                                   ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-20 22:50                                                     ` Dave Täht
2011-03-20 22:55                                                       ` grenville armitage
2011-03-20 23:04                                                         ` Dave Täht
2011-03-20 23:14                                                           ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-20 23:19                                                             ` Dave Täht
2011-03-20 23:23                                                               ` Dave Täht
2011-03-20 22:58                                                       ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-21  1:28                                                     ` david
2011-03-21  1:56                                                       ` Wesley Eddy
2011-03-18 18:27                                       ` [Bloat] Random idea in reaction to all the discussion ofTCPflavours " Richard Scheffenegger
2011-03-16 22:07                           ` [Bloat] Random idea in reaction to all the discussion of TCPflavours " Richard Scheffenegger
2011-03-17  0:10                             ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-16  0:47                 ` [Bloat] Random idea in reaction to all the discussion of TCP flavours " John W. Linville
2011-03-16 20:07                   ` Jim Gettys
2011-03-17  2:26                     ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-17 18:22                       ` Rick Jones
2011-03-17 21:50                         ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-17 22:20                           ` Rick Jones
2011-03-17 22:56                             ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
2011-03-18  1:36                               ` Justin McCann
2011-03-18  5:51                             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-15 16:34 ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-15 18:13   ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-03-16  5:41 ` Fred Baker
2011-03-16  6:26   ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-16  8:55 ` [Bloat] Random idea in reaction to all the discussion of TCPflavours " Richard Scheffenegger
2011-03-16  9:04 ` [Bloat] Random idea in reaction to all the discussion of TCP flavours " BeckW
2011-03-16 22:48   ` Fred Baker
2011-03-16 23:23     ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-17  8:34     ` BeckW

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=845EB260-932A-42F4-800C-005196B32D48@gmail.com \
    --to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox