From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [45.145.95.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F7103CB35 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 09:02:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1594818146; bh=sWzpILhffztqOpeRBchJsxMwddfZTqt0bf4LLbe0yss=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=m1GLtKlHCfpEYghFR55GKKChfkDyw1qYAQ/+B+EkEgsFyiwxjGpRdj8HWEMWvTPvI DyfttyqEy4gBf+2jooeN0to1QUgIZq4Td+U9QcyVPHvPd3ROdg3vS7ED/7nb6pEbzw iU+pkioZ8ca91oAU//lhur83UtI1GHQk2RPBeHBQHFsC0aGzGb6jPU8j2TK7ITxuEV cJUZo0jES2X/zKbwl/IcdMcsWpGgcB4lih584ht/7CZZfFK4pMd5dZTSZZTBxIM29n BlLCiFIxhMRngt44tp5OyT9UY6m4DzTcOSwhbL3ClLxU2ORgYCdJLouEk3LAzD6mBA QnSpx4jE/Lqww== To: Rich Brown , bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 15:02:26 +0200 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <871rldexst.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Bloat] Phoronix: Linux 5.9 to allow FQ_PIE as default X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 13:02:28 -0000 Rich Brown writes: > Is there any "there" here? I'm sorry, what? :) > https://www.phoronix.com/forums/forum/phoronix/latest-phoronix-articles/1193738-linux-5-9-to-allow-defaulting-to-fq-pie-queuing-discipline-for-fighting-bufferbloat As far as the patch, allowing fq_pie as default makes sense in that it is a "works with defaults" type of qdisc. Which as also the reason used in the patch IIRC. Not sure why anyone would *want* to run it as default over fq_codel; but TBH I have never tried it either, so... *shrugs* :) -Toke