From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>,
cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] talking at linux plumbers in portugal next week
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 17:10:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8736hda00q.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4RvsbRzmLQwKL1s_hF3J16-tGX0CQrUAn1xzgBRfJ8Hw@mail.gmail.com>
Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 7:45 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote:
>>
>> Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 5:23 AM Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 2 Sep 2019, Dave Taht wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > with copy-pasted parameters set in the 90s - openwrt's default, last I
>> >> > looked, was 25/sec.
>> >>
>> >> -A syn_flood -p tcp -m tcp --tcp-flags FIN,SYN,RST,ACK SYN -m limit --limit 25/sec --limit-burst 50 -m comment --comment "!fw3" -j RETURN
>> >> -A syn_flood -m comment --comment "!fw3" -j DROP
>> >>
>> >> Well, it's got a burst-size of 50. I agree that this is quite
>> >> conservative.
>> >>
>> >> However, at least in my home we're not seeing drops:
>> >>
>> >> # iptables -nvL | grep -A 4 "Chain syn_flood"
>> >> Chain syn_flood (1 references)
>> >> pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
>> >> 2296 113K RETURN tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x17/0x02 limit: avg 25/sec burst 50 /* !fw3 */
>> >> 0 0 DROP all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 /* !fw3 */
>> >>
>> >> But you might be right that in places with a lot more clients then this
>> >> might indeed cause problems.
>> >
>> > Well, *I* long ago had upped those params by 10x and don't see syn
>> > drops either on my backbone. But I rather suspect the rest of the
>> > world just copy-pasted it. It should scale as a function of bandwidth,
>> > I suppose, or get updated as a side effect of setting QoS - or just
>> > get bumped up. Start a bug over with openwrt? Take a hard look at
>> > other firewall designs?
>>
>> FWIW:
>>
>> # iptables -nvL syn_flood
>> Chain syn_flood (1 references)
>> pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
>> 195K 12M RETURN tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x17/0x02 limit: avg 25/sec burst 50 /* !fw3 */
>> 0 0 DROP all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 /* !fw3 */
>>
>> # ip6tables -nvL syn_flood
>> Chain syn_flood (1 references)
>> pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
>> 396 41508 RETURN tcp * * ::/0 ::/0 tcp flags:0x17/0x02 limit: avg 25/sec burst 50 /* !fw3 */
>> 0 0 DROP all * * ::/0 ::/0 /* !fw3 */
>>
>> rebooted this box today; don't seem to have hit the limit thus far,
>> though... This is on a gigabit link.
>
> Hmm. Try to trigger it with --te=upload_streams=200 ?
Sure, that triggers it:
# iptables -nvL syn_flood
Chain syn_flood (1 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
197K 12M RETURN tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x17/0x02 limit: avg 25/sec burst 50 /* !fw3 */
275 16480 DROP all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 /* !fw3 */
And I get tons of errors from netperf failing to start up.
However, the protection is only actually enabled for the INPUT chain;
i.e., I had to use the router itself as the netperf target to trigger
the rule. So not sure a rule such as this would be the cause of your
coffee shop failures?
This is with the default openwrt config, BTW:
config defaults
option syn_flood '1'
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-03 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-03 0:47 Dave Taht
2019-09-03 12:23 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2019-09-03 14:21 ` Dave Taht
2019-09-03 14:35 ` [Bloat] Revising the synflood limit Dave Taht
2019-09-10 18:08 ` [Bloat] [Cerowrt-devel] " Maciej Sołtysiak
2019-09-10 22:35 ` Dave Taht
2019-09-23 9:37 ` Maciej Sołtysiak
2019-09-03 14:45 ` [Bloat] talking at linux plumbers in portugal next week Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-09-03 14:47 ` Dave Taht
2019-09-03 15:10 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2019-09-03 15:21 ` Dave Taht
2019-09-03 15:22 ` [Bloat] [Cerowrt-devel] " Sebastian Moeller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8736hda00q.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=swmike@swm.pp.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox