From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [IPv6:2001:470:dc45:1000::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A8373BA8D
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 15:30:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail.toke.dk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.toke.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ABAA5F5CE;
 Tue, 31 Jan 2017 21:30:23 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023;
 t=1485894623; bh=WR2edgtGhmWoWnlRg9cm8b3HYOWnLHqhkAvGiSGAuGQ=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=c5GL5eeUY3jhJ0CR5t3VfyoQIeTzmvw7T+2+6/7L2nENc9Fvicjb9bhslzHuDYQRY
 uhNC6JlrzrNtFCSQ0Uxy/gWIhxudQ/qPBFwfCnM6TQdSxUyAGcSUAi5tZ4wddLTn0E
 laDNeak5muLMK7U47LdRkHnBmEI6B9yFGQmfW+x2gttGt7ZAFfFj5fD+cPjUETYXcg
 XLfx5b9WxPYtkKRHbvGHDhCb8TMmrdbghogDK7zEDZQEjavN8ZIDK6BpyZ2j4Nvc5h
 JJTQJmoeLogOF31wbk4Bq6qFok+s+pJxSEcUzRoJpOBMRqGWdJ+T1znOPqVUhFROGX
 Gqz+fLH2YECGg==
Received: by alrua-x1.borgediget.toke.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 3DA01181C4; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 21:30:23 +0100 (CET)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com>,  bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
References: <CALQXh-M7W-nuNM=tEXfx8atO2DPcFvhS3TNGVqYXFTSPs9emMw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA93jw4Anu7kXQTrKH1X5wRE5FoqsJ6CTvp6PhtQ1xe-756eFw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA93jw5Rai20WY4hAed4nLtPon7n3OSsZjZh4dDQHGGzQYLC0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 21:30:23 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5Rai20WY4hAed4nLtPon7n3OSsZjZh4dDQHGGzQYLC0w@mail.gmail.com>
 (Dave Taht's message of "Tue, 31 Jan 2017 12:22:04 -0800")
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <8737fz2crk.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [Bloat] I have a new record for bloat
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:30:30 -0000

Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> writes:

> As for my best-ever winner for an ISP test under load, this is cake
> compared against sonic.net's default router for their fiber network
> connecting from SF to my box in fremont (10 hops).
>
> http://www.taht.net/~d/sonic_106_cake_vs_default.png
>
> We're talking a max of 1.5ms extra induced jitter under load here...
> on a 4ms path... and actually latency is reduced once the link gets
> going. I sort of now need to do a strictly voip/videoconference test
> with no other traffic on the link because of the gpon related
> acquire/release delays... but the jamophone seems more feasible by the
> day.
>
> (I managed to get it closer to 100% of the uplink later)

Yay! Welcome to the 21st century! ;)

-Toke