General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: d@taht.net (Dave Täht)
To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Analyzing wireless multiqueue behavior & bufferbloat
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:07:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8739nuwftj.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110211181107.GB32302@bougret.hpl.hp.com> (Jean Tourrilhes's message of "Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:11:07 -0800")


(I note that although my personal focus is on wireless, that bufferbloat
is a current problem in many/most other types of devices, and I do not
want the bufferbloat discussion dominated by wireless issues.)

I suppose it would help others a little bit if others knew the formerly
private email jean was responding to:

I'd written:

All:

I've (as yet) been unable to dig up anything that coherently explains
how the Linux mq and multiq qdiscs (if indeed, they are different) are
supposed to be hooked up to the wireless driver portion of the stack,
and managed. 

There also seems to be an impedance mismatch between the availability of
various theoretical QoS mechanisms in the 802.11 standards and their
actual implementations in the networking stacks. We're treating wireless
too much like ethernet to the detriment of the entire internet.

I have no insight at all as to how things are done on Apple products.

High on my list is making TX_RETRY a tunable.

And I'm deeply concerned about possible side-effects of packet
aggregation in 802.11n.

I've also been unable to dig up the original mosquitonet paper - or
something more current - that determined the need for link layer error
correction/retransmits in the first place.

Perhaps you guys could ask around for more/better information on these
issues and get back on them to the bloat list? [1]

-- 
Dave Taht
http://nex-6.taht.net


      reply	other threads:[~2011-02-11 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <871v3ey4rk.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org>
2011-02-11 17:55 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2011-02-11 18:11   ` Jean Tourrilhes
2011-02-11 19:07     ` Dave Täht [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8739nuwftj.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org \
    --to=d@taht.net \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox