From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [IPv6:2001:470:dc45:1000::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0A693BA8E
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 15:54:57 -0500 (EST)
From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023;
 t=1543352096; bh=ILU73KtOcqkYYkd/Ryt9EbDSD6yi0w4d8wzszUPdzV8=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From;
 b=ej9hU4q8wuujJbT1M0UGWL9n7TqhVOV9U4gZ5DxtXmjG00EBMjaXZ1UKSI9Tom5uH
 pmZJ1fQ63igJdKqq8yXIwxR2O8uTpDrLBuASbfIUaMzaK0eyLxIIcClJ42397tnyLy
 NJzseyamSOx5q5dHV5Z3MMIV+zsqWupEBmcGV+CoLMI90PYUfCaEWC+7PC63ZlS+/s
 2cpquKL/i7N/2uQyKr8kZZO4KlXX/JSr9Pq+pQfcF/vvEPXufD7wh2WXyaNicEWep2
 Wsy+nPJf5G0u+rBabyDMdNDrLryvneKg9tIg6+c80b3zGzUPKBm+aZ+7a+nj9C3xqU
 RelWEoArr5EZQ==
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5WWeE-LYNurfv2zYcn73fdUTa3anWpkhg=29XEWpjOEA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <65EAC6C1-4688-46B6-A575-A6C7F2C066C5@heistp.net>
 <CADVnQymdAUgHQ81TdrohY-EeLBOyR6_hdpVKHm+VXgis4UNQxg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA93jw5WWeE-LYNurfv2zYcn73fdUTa3anWpkhg=29XEWpjOEA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 21:54:55 +0100
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <874lc2w89s.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [Bloat] when does the CoDel part of fq_codel help in the real
	world?
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 20:54:58 -0000

Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> writes:

> I've done things like measure induced latency on wireguard streams of
> late and codel keeps it sane. still, wireguard internally is optimized
> for single flow "dragster" performance, and I'd like it to gain the
> same fq_codel optimization that did such nice things for multiple
> flows terminating on the router for ipsec. The before/after on that
> was marvelous.

This is on my list, FWIW :)

-Toke