From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.taht.net (mail.taht.net [176.58.107.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B49D3CB38 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:04:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dancer.taht.net (unknown [IPv6:2603:3024:1536:86f0:eea8:6bff:fefe:9a2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.taht.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC9991F40B; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 21:04:50 +0000 (UTC) From: Dave Taht To: Simon Leinen Cc: Dave Taht , bloat References: Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 14:04:38 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Simon Leinen's message of "Sun, 9 Jun 2019 13:46:28 +0200") Message-ID: <875zp7lvyx.fsf@taht.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Bloat] openvswitch usage in the wild? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 21:04:52 -0000 Simon Leinen writes: > Dave Taht writes: >> what is openvswitch used for nowadays? >> https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2015-March/296317.html > > In OpenStack deployments, "ML2+OVS" is a popular backend for the > "Neutron" networking service - maybe the most popular for mid-size > installations. > > We and many others use it. However I haven't heard of anyone using sfq > or fq_codel (or any other fancy qdisc) in this context. good to have this very broad summary! Thx everyone!