From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] extremely good dslreports result for bufferbloat on free.fr
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 18:32:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87618e6gkm.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4mkgXYyY6s4h+f7F5SOOpxjoKNNKUEeNzjVKFjjDN1=w@mail.gmail.com>
Free.fr (Proxad) is certainly much better than other ISPs -- they've been
the first to give sort-of-native (6rd) IPv6 to the masses. However,
there's one thing that annoys me -- they have two distinct CPEs, the
classic FreeBox (which I have) and the FreeBox Revolution (which is
slightly less cheap, and takes more physical space -- a big deal if you
live in Paris). The classic FreeBox needs some love from the firmware
developers, and I'd be curious to know whether your results apply equally
to both boxen.
(The thing that most pisses me off with the classic FreeBox is that it
doesn't allow IPv6 subnetting -- unless you order the FreeBox Revolution,
you're condemned to the purgatory of ND-proxying. Grr.)
-- Juliusz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-29 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-28 14:48 Dave Taht
2015-04-28 23:33 ` jb
2015-04-28 23:44 ` David Lang
2015-04-29 1:39 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-04-29 2:01 ` Dave Taht
2015-04-29 2:49 ` jb
2015-04-29 16:32 ` Juliusz Chroboczek [this message]
2015-04-29 18:32 ` Dave Taht
[not found] ` <CAH3Ss96FnwgK8qxdV-n46GLe2FSsRRa7zD1M_Wmq91o=+-7qdQ@mail.gmail.com>
2015-04-30 4:23 ` Dave Taht
2015-04-30 4:33 ` jb
2015-04-30 4:43 ` Dave Taht
2015-04-30 4:55 ` Dave Taht
2015-04-30 5:23 ` Dave Taht
2015-04-30 5:49 ` jb
2015-04-30 16:36 ` Dave Taht
2015-05-01 0:48 ` Rich Brown
2015-05-01 3:10 ` jb
2015-05-01 4:41 ` [Bloat] ThinkBroadBand also has a bloat detector in their speed test Rich Brown
2015-05-01 6:17 ` jb
2015-05-01 6:05 ` [Bloat] extremely good dslreports result for bufferbloat on free.fr Dave Taht
2015-05-01 6:31 ` jb
2015-05-01 8:10 ` Dave Taht
2015-05-02 11:49 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-05-02 13:40 ` jb
2015-05-02 15:01 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-05-02 16:55 ` Dave Taht
2015-05-02 17:15 ` Aaron Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87618e6gkm.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr \
--to=jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox