From: d@taht.net (Dave Täht)
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat-devel <bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Progress with latency-under-load tool
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 16:55:29 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8762rde719.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FD25FEB9-BC98-4DB4-AF86-77F01B316598@gmail.com> (Jonathan Morton's message of "Mon, 21 Mar 2011 00:52:36 +0200")
Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> writes:
> On 21 Mar, 2011, at 12:47 am, Dave Täht wrote:
>
>>> The interesting outlier thus far is 8... I'm tempted to stop the test
>>> now and recompile for testing 3 u/l 3 d/l first....
>>
>> Scenario 12: 2 uploads, 2 downloads... 4725 KiB/s up, 3645 KiB/s
>> down, 0.81 Hz smoothness
>>
>> ... Still running tests ...
>
> I should probably explain what the scenarios are.
>
> Every combination of up/down flows is tried for each of 1, 2, 3, 4
> total flows. That's 14 scenarios covering basic downloading and
> uploading through to heavy whole-family use.
>
> Then I jump ahead to 32 flows, with 32/0, 31/1, 16/16, 1/31, 0/32
> splits, to simulate BitTorrent style traffic.
>
> Total 19 scenarios.
I'll still argue that starting with the worst case scenarios and working
down would be best... 3/3 perhaps
Scenario 12: 2 uploads, 2 downloads... 4725 KiB/s up, 3645 KiB/s down, 0.81 Hz smoothness
Scenario 13: 3 uploads, 1 downloads... 4917 KiB/s up, 3175 KiB/s down, 0.59 Hz smoothness
>
> - Jonathan
>
--
Dave Taht
http://nex-6.taht.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-20 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-16 2:31 Jonathan Morton
2011-03-16 17:12 ` Rick Jones
2011-03-17 23:38 ` grenville armitage
2011-03-19 17:44 ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-20 10:45 ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-20 20:33 ` grenville armitage
2011-03-20 20:53 ` Dave Täht
2011-03-20 21:52 ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-20 22:32 ` Dave Täht
2011-03-20 22:47 ` Dave Täht
2011-03-20 22:52 ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-20 22:55 ` Dave Täht [this message]
2011-03-20 23:42 ` Dave Täht
2011-03-20 21:50 ` [Bloat] Some results of the latency under load tool Dave Täht
2011-03-20 22:24 ` Jonathan Morton
[not found] ` <m3d3llgln8.fsf@yahoo.com>
2011-03-21 6:43 ` [Bloat] Progress with latency-under-load tool Jonathan Morton
2011-03-22 1:13 ` Kim Hawtin
2011-03-22 7:10 ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-23 10:33 ` Otto Solares Cabrera
2011-03-23 11:26 ` Jonathan Morton
2011-03-23 19:27 ` Otto Solares
2011-03-23 20:40 ` Jonathan Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8762rde719.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org \
--to=d@taht.net \
--cc=bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox