From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-12-iad.dyndns.com (mxout-070-iad.mailhop.org [216.146.32.70]) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E7F02E0632 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 15:55:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scan-12-iad.mailhop.org (scan-12-iad.local [10.150.0.209]) by mail-12-iad.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86AC637081C for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 22:55:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Score: 0.1 () X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 75.145.127.229 Received: from gw.co.teklibre.org (75-145-127-229-Colorado.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [75.145.127.229]) by mail-12-iad.dyndns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0213706E7; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 22:55:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cruithne.co.teklibre.org (unknown [IPv6:2002:4b91:7fe5:1::20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cruithne.co.teklibre.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by gw.co.teklibre.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 553FA5EB01; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 16:55:32 -0600 (MDT) Received: by cruithne.co.teklibre.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1ED1B120889; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 16:55:30 -0600 (MDT) From: d@taht.net (Dave =?utf-8?Q?T=C3=A4ht?=) To: Jonathan Morton Organization: Teklibre - http://www.teklibre.com References: <0D59AD34-AA64-4376-BB8E-58C5D378F488@gmail.com> <4D829B58.1070601@swin.edu.au> <4D8664A9.5060805@swin.edu.au> <87k4fte83o.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org> <87ei61e7ez.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org> Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 16:55:29 -0600 In-Reply-To: (Jonathan Morton's message of "Mon, 21 Mar 2011 00:52:36 +0200") Message-ID: <8762rde719.fsf@cruithne.co.teklibre.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: bloat-devel , bloat Subject: Re: [Bloat] Progress with latency-under-load tool X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 22:55:35 -0000 Jonathan Morton writes: > On 21 Mar, 2011, at 12:47 am, Dave T=C3=A4ht wrote: > >>> The interesting outlier thus far is 8... I'm tempted to stop the test >>> now and recompile for testing 3 u/l 3 d/l first.... >>=20 >> Scenario 12: 2 uploads, 2 downloads... 4725 KiB/s up, 3645 KiB/s >> down, 0.81 Hz smoothness >>=20 >> ... Still running tests ... > > I should probably explain what the scenarios are. > > Every combination of up/down flows is tried for each of 1, 2, 3, 4 > total flows. That's 14 scenarios covering basic downloading and > uploading through to heavy whole-family use. > > Then I jump ahead to 32 flows, with 32/0, 31/1, 16/16, 1/31, 0/32 > splits, to simulate BitTorrent style traffic. > > Total 19 scenarios. I'll still argue that starting with the worst case scenarios and working down would be best... 3/3 perhaps Scenario 12: 2 uploads, 2 downloads... 4725 KiB/s up, 3645 KiB/s down, 0.81= Hz smoothness Scenario 13: 3 uploads, 1 downloads... 4917 KiB/s up, 3175 KiB/s down, 0.59= Hz smoothness > > - Jonathan > --=20 Dave Taht http://nex-6.taht.net